Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33825032›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

MRI-based radiomics signature for pretreatment prediction of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma: a multicenter study.

Haimei Chen, Xiao Zhang, Xiaohong Wang, Xianyue Quan, Yu Deng, Ming Lu, Qingzhu Wei, Qiang Ye, Quan Zhou, Zhiming Xiang and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Automatic identification algorithm of meniscus tear based on radiomics of knee MRI].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2022
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Haimei Chen *Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Academy of Orthopedics. Guangdong Province), 183 Zhongshan Da Dao Xi, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China.
Xiao Zhang *Zhuhai Precision Medical Center, Zhuhai People's Hospital (Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University), Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China.
Xiaohong WangDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China.
Xianyue QuanDepartment of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510282, Guangdong, China.
Yu DengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China.
Ming LuDepartment of Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China.
Qingzhu WeiDepartment of Pathology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China.
Qiang YeDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Academy of Orthopedics. Guangdong Province), 183 Zhongshan Da Dao Xi, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China.
Quan ZhouDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Academy of Orthopedics. Guangdong Province), 183 Zhongshan Da Dao Xi, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China.
Zhiming XiangDepartment of Radiology, Panyu Central Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, 511400, Guangdong, China.
Changhong LiangDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Wei YangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China. weiyanggm@gmail.com.
Yinghua ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Academy of Orthopedics. Guangdong Province), 183 Zhongshan Da Dao Xi, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China. zyh7258957@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4879-5047

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China No. 2017YFC1309100the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant Nos. 81871510, 81771912, 81771916, 61471187the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou No. 201903010032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and validate a radiomics signature based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from multicenter datasets for preoperative prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with osteosarcoma.

methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 102 patients with histologically confirmed osteosarcoma who received chemotherapy before treatment from 4 hospitals (68 in the primary cohort and 34 in the external validation cohort). Quantitative imaging features were extracted from contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted images (CE FS T1WI). Four classification methods, i.e., the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression (LASSO-LR), support vector machine (SVM), Gaussian process (GP), and Naive Bayes (NB) algorithm, were compared for feature selection and radiomics signature construction. The predictive performance of the radiomics signatures was assessed with the area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

resultsThirteen radiomics features selected based on the LASSO-LR classifier were adopted to construct the radiomics signature, which was significantly associated with the pathologic response. The prediction model achieved the best performance between good and poor responders with an AUC of 0.882 (95% CI, 0.837-0.918) in the primary cohort. Calibration curves showed good agreement. Similarly, findings were validated in the external validation cohort with good performance (AUC, 0.842 [95% CI, 0.793-0.883]) and good calibration. DCA analysis confirmed the clinical utility of the selected radiomics signature.

conclusionThe constructed CE FS T1WI-radiomics signature with excellent performance could provide a potential tool to predict pathologic response to NAC in patients with osteosarcoma. KEY POINTS: • The radiomics signature based on multicenter contrast-enhanced MRI was useful to predict response to NAC. • The prediction model obtained with the LASSO-LR classifier achieved the best performance. • The baseline clinical characteristics were not associated with response to NAC.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsOsteosarcomaBayes TheoremHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective StudiesLogistic modelsMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant therapyOsteosarcoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.