ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022
Deep learning-based automatic surgical step recognition in intraoperative videos for transanal total mesorectal excision.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in the operating room: A systematic review of AI models for surgical phase, instruments and anatomical structure identification.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- An intraoperative artificial intelligence system identifying anatomical landmarks for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective clinical feasibility trial (J-SUMMIT-C-01).Surgical endoscopy · 2023Trial
- Artificial intelligence-based model for identifying anatomical and surgical structures in the videos of laparoscopic left hemicolectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Surgical Phase Analysis Enables Objective Assessment of Surgeon Skill in Robotic Distal Gastrectomy: A Multicenter Study.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- The first reported case using real-time artificial intelligence with single-port robotics for colorectal surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Minimally Invasive and Robotic Gastrointestinal Surgery: Major Applications and Recent Advances.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Development of an artificial intelligence based virtual tool for measuring distances during image-guided surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in the surgical management for colorectal cancer: current applications and future directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- AI-enabled multi-omics integration in colorectal cancer: from molecular stratification to clinical translation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Use of artificial intelligence in the analysis of digital videos of invasive surgical procedures: scoping review.BJS open · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for intraoperative video analysis in robotic-assisted esophagectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Powered Quality Assurance: Transforming Diagnostics, Surgery, and Patient Care-Innovations, Limitations, and Future Directions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Challenges in multi-centric generalization: phase and step recognition in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024Article
- Deep learning-based surgical step recognition for laparoscopic right-sided colectomy.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Article
- Real-time segmentation of biliary structure in pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Machine learning perioperative applications in visceral surgery: a narrative review.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Review
- Automatic surgical phase recognition-based skill assessment in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using multicenter videos.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024Article
- Development of a deep learning model for safe direct optical trocar insertion in minimally invasive surgery: an innovative method to prevent trocar injuries.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Evolution of a surgical system using deep learning in minimally invasive surgery (Review).Biomedical reports · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDividing a surgical procedure into a sequence of identifiable and meaningful steps facilitates intraoperative video data acquisition and storage. These efforts are especially valuable for technically challenging procedures that require intraoperative video analysis, such as transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME); however, manual video indexing is time-consuming. Thus, in this study, we constructed an annotated video dataset for TaTME with surgical step information and evaluated the performance of a deep learning model in recognizing the surgical steps in TaTME.
methodsThis was a single-institutional retrospective feasibility study. All TaTME intraoperative videos were divided into frames. Each frame was manually annotated as one of the following major steps: (1) purse-string closure; (2) full thickness transection of the rectal wall; (3) down-to-up dissection; (4) dissection after rendezvous; and (5) purse-string suture for stapled anastomosis. Steps 3 and 4 were each further classified into four sub-steps, specifically, for dissection of the anterior, posterior, right, and left planes. A convolutional neural network-based deep learning model, Xception, was utilized for the surgical step classification task.
resultsOur dataset containing 50 TaTME videos was randomly divided into two subsets for training and testing with 40 and 10 videos, respectively. The overall accuracy obtained for all classification steps was 93.2%. By contrast, when sub-step classification was included in the performance analysis, a mean accuracy (± standard deviation) of 78% (± 5%), with a maximum accuracy of 85%, was obtained.
conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first study based on automatic surgical step classification for TaTME. Our deep learning model self-learned and recognized the classification steps in TaTME videos with high accuracy after training. Thus, our model can be applied to a system for intraoperative guidance or for postoperative video indexing and analysis in TaTME procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.