ArticleCureus2021
Craniometric Measurements and Surgical Outcomes in Trigonocephaly Patients Who Underwent Surgical Treatment.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cosmetic satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes following surgical treatment of single-suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to discuss the results of craniometric measurements and surgical treatments in patients operated for isolated trigonocephaly (TC) in light of the current literature. Methods A total of 18 cases who underwent surgery for isolated TC were included in the study. Age, gender, family history, follow-up time, complications, duration of surgery, surgical blood loss, and amount of blood replacement in these patients were recorded. Craniometric measurements such as metopic angle (MA), cephalic index (CI), interparietal distance (IPD), intercoronal distance (ICD), and their ratio to each other were evaluated according to pre-and postoperative parameters. Photographs of the patients were taken before and after the operation. The Whitaker classification and Kampf "aesthetic outcome staging" were used in the evaluations. Results The mean MA values after the operation increased to reach above 147 degrees in all cases. The average CI did not change. ICD measurement averages increased significantly. The average IPD/ICD ratio decreased due to the increase in ICD and the enlargement of the anterior fossa after the operation. According to the Whitaker classification and Kampf "aesthetic outcome staging" scale, 17 of our cases were at stage I, rated as perfect, and one was at stage II, rated as good. Conclusion Surgery performed at the appropriate time for TC yields cosmetically satisfactory results. Since potential neurological and cognitive morbidities occur mostly in school-age patients, long-term follow-up of the cases is required. Performing craniometric measurements enables patients to be evaluated with objective and measurable numerical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.