Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33824630›Full record

ArticleOccupational therapy international2021

Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Scale A-ONE: An Italian Cross-Sectional Study.

Margherita Cerone, Marco Tofani, Giovanni Fabbrini, Giulia Marcellini, Anna Berardi, Claudia Conti, Rita De Santis, Donatella Valente, Giovanni Galeoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational therapy international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Margherita CeroneSan Giovanni Battista-Cavalieri di Malta, Rome, Italy.
Marco TofaniNeurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Intensive Neurorehabilitation and Robotics, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2071-4513
Giovanni FabbriniDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9043-5686
Giulia MarcelliniSapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Anna BerardiDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0670-5303
Claudia ContiSapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Rita De SantisDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Donatella ValenteDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Giovanni GaleotoDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study is aimed at validating the A-ONE scale in an Italian population with Central Nervous System (CNS) dysfunction.

resultsA total of 70 people having a diagnosis of neurological disorders were evaluated. The internal consistency showed Cronbach's coefficient alpha ranging from 0.634 to 0.959. The measurement of reliability varied from 0.984 to 0.997 for intrarater and from 0.979 to 0.998 for interrater. Pearson's correlation coefficient between the A-ONE and the Barthel index and the responsiveness showed statistically significant values (

conclusionsThe present study provides preliminary evidence of reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the A-ONE when using elderly people with CNS dysfunction.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCerebrovascular DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTask Performance and Analysis

Identifiers

PMID33824630
PMCPMC7994097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.