ReviewPatient preference and adherence2021
Strategies for Improving Inhalation Technique in Children: A Narrative Review.
Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Video directly observed therapy to improve inhaler technique among pediatric patients with persistent asthma.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2025Trial
- To the RESCUE: program fidelity and experiences of an Illinois stock inhaler program.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2026Article
- Gamified Feedback-Based Training System for Pediatric Asthma Inhaler Use: Mixed Methods Randomized Crossover Study.JMIR serious games · 2026Article
- Time to face mask/spacer acceptance in dogs and cats.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2025Article
- School-supervised Asthma Therapy is Associated with Improved Long-Term Asthma Outcomes for Underrepresented Minority Children.The Journal of school nursing : the official publication of the National Association of School Nurses · 2024Article
- Real-World Use of Inhaled COPD Medications: the Good, the Bad, the Ugly.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2024Article
- Pediatric Drug Development: Reviewing Challenges and Opportunities by Tracking Innovative Therapies.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Analysis of the Consumption of Drugs Prescribed for the Treatment of Asthma in Belgian Children.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Parent-administered Metered-dose Inhalers Improves Medication Administration Time in the Children's Emergency.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inhaled medicines are commonly utilized by children for various respiratory conditions and must be used effectively for the medication to reach the airways. Poor inhaler technique contributes to poorly controlled asthma with significant associated morbidity. Given the significant consequences of improper inhaler use in children, the goal of this review is to comprehensively describe existing and potential solutions to improve inhaler technique. Because children move through various settings, including clinical practices, schools, pharmacies, and homes, in their daily routine, there is great opportunity to teach and reinforce proper inhaler technique across settings. Within each setting, in-person and technology-based interventions have shown promise to improve technique. These solutions need to be more broadly adopted to deliver tailored education with support for provider training, team-based care, communication structures, and reimbursement. Such solutions hold the potential to improve inhaler use among children, with potential for decreasing morbidity and costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.