ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2021
Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation: reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics).
Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Clinical Pathway Initiative: Identifying role relevant competencies in genomic pathways.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Preparing healthcare providers to use polygenic risk scores: a qualitative study of learning needs and educational preferences.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Variant interpretation training for the genomics era: Learning outcomes to inform professional competencies and education.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Piloting an Interpretive External Quality Assurance Model for Genomic Testing for Childhood Syndromes and Intellectual Disability.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2026Article
- The Competency Framework for Genomics Nurse Educators: An International Delphi Study to Advance Global Nursing Education.International nursing review · 2025Article
- Evaluating the impact of a national virtual continuing professional development program in gynecological oncology: a Kirkpatrick model approach.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Nephrogenomics, precision medicine and the role of genetic testing in adult kidney disease management.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2025Review
- Next-generation nephrology: part 2-mainstreaming genomics in nephrology, a global perspective.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Review
- Empowering human research ethics committees to review genomics applications: evaluating the utility of a custom online education resource.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Global Health and Genomics.The Nursing clinics of North America · 2025Review
- Increasing the genomic workforce through research capacity building: Designing evaluation plans for maximum impact.American journal of human genetics · 2025Review
- Building a Genomics-Informed Nursing Workforce: Recommendations for Oncology Nursing Practice and Beyond.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- Ensuring best practice in genomics education: A theory- and empirically informed evaluation framework.American journal of human genetics · 2024Review
- Ensuring best practice in genomics education: A scoping review of genomics education needs assessments and evaluations.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Developing leadership competencies for genomics integration through globally networked learning and education.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Continuing education and professional development: Unifying opportunities for genetic counselors globally.Genetics in medicine open · 2024Article
- Genomic newborn screening for rare diseases.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023Review
- Article
- Evaluation of two Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in genomic variant interpretation for the NHS workforce.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Australian Genomics: Outcomes of a 5-year national program to accelerate the integration of genomics in healthcare.American journal of human genetics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
44 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWidespread, quality genomics education for health professionals is required to create a competent genomic workforce. A lack of standards for reporting genomics education and evaluation limits the evidence base for replication and comparison. We therefore undertook a consensus process to develop a recommended minimum set of information to support consistent reporting of design, development, delivery, and evaluation of genomics education interventions.
methodsDraft standards were derived from literature (25 items from 21 publications). Thirty-six international experts were purposively recruited for three rounds of a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on relevance, clarity, comprehensiveness, utility, and design.
resultsThe final standards include 18 items relating to development and delivery of genomics education interventions, 12 relating to evaluation, and 1 on stakeholder engagement.
conclusionThese Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics (RISE2 Genomics) are intended to be widely applicable across settings and health professions. Their use by those involved in reporting genomics education interventions and evaluation, as well as adoption by journals and policy makers as the expected standard, will support greater transparency, consistency, and comprehensiveness of reporting. Consequently, the genomics education evidence base will be more robust, enabling high-quality education and evaluation across diverse settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33824503What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.