Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33824425›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2021

Evolutionary stasis of a deep subsurface microbial lineage.

Eric D Becraft, Maggie C Y Lau Vetter, Oliver K I Bezuidt, Julia M Brown, Jessica M Labonté, Kotryna Kauneckaite-Griguole, Ruta Salkauskaite, Gediminas Alzbutas, Joshua D Sackett, Brittany R Kruger and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Species-resolved, single-cell respiration rates reveal dominance of sulfate reduction in a deep continental subsurface ecosystem.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Deep terrestrial indigenous microbial community dominated byCommunications earth & environment · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genomic insights intoFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Eric D BecraftBigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, East Boothbay, ME, USA.
Maggie C Y Lau VetterInstitute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sanya, Hainan Province, P. R. China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2812-9749
Oliver K I BezuidtBigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, East Boothbay, ME, USA.
Julia M BrownBigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, East Boothbay, ME, USA.
Jessica M LabontéDepartment of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0236-7634
Kotryna Kauneckaite-GriguoleThermo Fisher Scientific Baltics, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Ruta SalkauskaiteThermo Fisher Scientific Baltics, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Gediminas AlzbutasThermo Fisher Scientific Baltics, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Joshua D SackettDivision of Hydrologic Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Brittany R KrugerDivision of Hydrologic Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Vitaly KadnikovInstitute of Bioengineering, Research Center of Biotechnology RAS, Moscow, Russia.
Esta van HeerdenCentre for Water Sciences and Management, North West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Duane MoserDivision of Hydrologic Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Nikolai RavinInstitute of Bioengineering, Research Center of Biotechnology RAS, Moscow, Russia.
Tullis OnstottDepartment of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Ramunas StepanauskasBigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, East Boothbay, ME, USA. rstepanauskas@bigelow.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4458-3108

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sulfate-reducing bacteria Candidatus Desulforudis audaxviator (CDA) were originally discovered in deep fracture fluids accessed via South African gold mines and have since been found in geographically widespread deep subsurface locations. In order to constrain models for subsurface microbial evolution, we compared CDA genomes from Africa, North America and Eurasia using single cell genomics. Unexpectedly, 126 partial single amplified genomes from the three continents, a complete genome from of an isolate from Eurasia, and metagenome-assembled genomes from Africa and Eurasia shared >99.2% average nucleotide identity, low frequency of SNP's, and near-perfectly conserved prophages and CRISPRs. Our analyses reject sample cross-contamination, recent natural dispersal, and unusually strong purifying selection as likely explanations for these unexpected results. We therefore conclude that the analyzed CDA populations underwent only minimal evolution since their physical separation, potentially as far back as the breakup of Pangea between 165 and 55 Ma ago. High-fidelity DNA replication and repair mechanisms are the most plausible explanation for the highly conserved genome of CDA. CDA presents a stark contrast to the current model organisms in microbial evolutionary studies, which often develop adaptive traits over far shorter periods of time.

Indexed as

MetagenomePeptococcaceaeGenomicsMiningPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID33824425
PMCPMC8443664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.