Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33824310›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Identifying multiple sclerosis subtypes using unsupervised machine learning and MRI data.

Arman Eshaghi, Alexandra L Young, Peter A Wijeratne, Ferran Prados, Douglas L Arnold, Sridar Narayanan, Charles R G Guttmann, Frederik Barkhof, Daniel C Alexander, Alan J Thompson and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 134 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
27.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 250 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Brain atrophy rates vary with age in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Rethinking MS Therapeutics: From Disease Pathogenesis Mechanisms to AI-Driven Drug Discovery.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. From lesion detection to outcome prediction: artificial intelligence and deep learning applications in multiple sclerosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Arman EshaghiQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK. a.eshaghi@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6652-3512
Alexandra L YoungCentre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Peter A WijeratneCentre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4885-6241
Ferran PradosQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7872-0142
Douglas L ArnoldMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sridar NarayananMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Charles R G GuttmannCenter for Neurological Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Frederik BarkhofQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3543-3706
Daniel C AlexanderCentre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2439-350X
Alan J ThompsonQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4333-8496
Declan Chard *Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3076-2682
Olga Ciccarelli *Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Queen Mary University of London · GBMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CAUniversity College London · GBBrigham and Women's Hospital · USKing's College London · GBUniversitat Oberta de Catalunya · ES

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
Department of Health RP-2017-08-ST2-004Medical Research Council MR/T027770/1Medical Research Council MR/T027800/1NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) can be divided into four phenotypes based on clinical evolution. The pathophysiological boundaries of these phenotypes are unclear, limiting treatment stratification. Machine learning can identify groups with similar features using multidimensional data. Here, to classify MS subtypes based on pathological features, we apply unsupervised machine learning to brain MRI scans acquired in previously published studies. We use a training dataset from 6322 MS patients to define MRI-based subtypes and an independent cohort of 3068 patients for validation. Based on the earliest abnormalities, we define MS subtypes as cortex-led, normal-appearing white matter-led, and lesion-led. People with the lesion-led subtype have the highest risk of confirmed disability progression (CDP) and the highest relapse rate. People with the lesion-led MS subtype show positive treatment response in selected clinical trials. Our findings suggest that MRI-based subtypes predict MS disability progression and response to treatment and may be used to define groups of patients in interventional trials.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingUnsupervised Machine LearningAdultDatabases as TopicDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalMultiple SclerosisPlacebosRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceReproducibility of ResultsPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID33824310
PMCPMC8024377
OpenAlexW3148523720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.