Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33823859›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2021

Implementation research training for learners in low- and middle-income countries: evaluating behaviour change after participating in a massive open online course.

Pascal Launois, Dermot Maher, Edith Certain, Bella Ross, Michael J Penkunas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Pascal LaunoisSpecial Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), WHO, 20 Ave Appia, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Dermot MaherSpecial Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), WHO, 20 Ave Appia, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Edith CertainSpecial Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), WHO, 20 Ave Appia, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Bella RossStudent Academic Support Unit, Monash University, 900 Dandenong Road, Caulfield East, 3145, Australia. bella.ross@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1686-8264
Michael J PenkunasUnited Nations University International Institute for Global Health (UNU-IIGH), UNU-IIGH Building, UKM Medical Centre, Jalan Yaacob Latif, 5600, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative · CHMonash University · AUUniversity Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre · MY

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementation research (IR) can play a critical role in the delivery of disease control interventions, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The growing demand for IR training has led to the development of a range of training programmes and university courses, the majority of which can not be accessed by learners in LMICs. This article reports on the evaluation of the massive open online course (MOOC) developed by the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases hosted by WHO on the topic of IR with a focus on infectious diseases of poverty. This study followed the Kirkpatrick Model to evaluate training programmes with a specific focus on post-training changes in behaviour.

methodsMOOC participants were invited to take part in an anonymous online survey examining their knowledge of IR and how they applied it in their professional practice approximately 1-1.5 years after completing their course. The survey contained 43 open-ended, multiple choice and Likert-type questions. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the quantitative data and responses to the open-ended questions were thematically coded.

resultsA total of 748 MOOC participants responded to the survey. The demographic profile of the survey respondents aligned with that of the MOOC participants, with nearly 70% of respondents originating from Africa. Responses to the quantitative and open-ended survey questions revealed that respondents' knowledge of IR had improved to a large extent as a result of the MOOC, and that they used the knowledge and skills gained in their professional lives frequently and had consequently changed their professional behaviour. Respondents most often cited the problem-solving aspect of IR as a substantial area of behavioral change influenced by participating in the MOOC.

conclusionsThese findings indicate that the MOOC was successful in targeting learners from LMICs, in strengthening their IR knowledge and contributing to their ability to apply it in their professional practice. The utility of MOOCs for providing IR training to learners in LMICs, where implementation challenges are encountered often, makes this platform an ideal standalone learning tool or one that could be combined with other training formats.

Indexed as

Education, DistanceAfricaDeveloping CountriesHumansPovertySurveys and QuestionnairesKirkpatrick modelLow- and middle-income countriesMassive open online courseTraining

Identifiers

PMID33823859
PMCPMC8025553
OpenAlexW3112874429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.