Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33823855›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2021

A scoping review of international policy responses to mental health recovery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Claire McCartan, Tomas Adell, Julie Cameron, Gavin Davidson, Lee Knifton, Shari McDaid, Ciaran Mulholland

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. 'A lot of small things make a difference'. Mental health and strategies of coping during the COVID-19 pandemic.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown and Wellbeing: Experiences from Aotearoa New Zealand in 2020.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claire McCartanCentre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom. c.j.mccartan@qub.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2341-9715
Tomas AdellDepartment of Health Northern Ireland, Mental Health Capacity Unit, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Julie CameronMental Health Foundation, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Gavin DavidsonCentre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Lee KniftonMental Health Foundation, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Shari McDaidMental Health Foundation, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Ciaran MulhollandCentre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Mental Health Foundation · GBQueen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected people's physical and mental health. Quarantine and other lockdown measures have altered people's daily lives; levels of anxiety, depression, substance use, self-harm and suicide ideation have increased. This commentary assesses how international governments, agencies and organisations are responding to the challenge of the mental health impact of COVID-19 with the aim of informing the ongoing policy and service responses needed in the immediate and longer term. It identifies some of the key themes emerging from the literature, recognises at-risk populations and highlights opportunities for innovation within mental health services, focusing on the published academic literature, international health ministry websites and other relevant international organisations beyond the United Kingdom and Ireland. COVID-19 has challenged, and may have permanently changed, mental health services. It has highlighted and exacerbated pre-existing pressures and inequities. Many decision-makers consider this an opportunity to transform mental health care, and tackling the social determinants of mental health and engaging in prevention will be a necessary part of such transformation. Better data collection, modelling and sharing will enhance policy and service development. The crisis provides opportunities to build on positive innovations: the adaptability and flexibility of community-based care; drawing on lived experience in the design, development and monitoring of services; interagency collaboration; accelerating digital healthcare; and connecting physical and mental health.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlDelivery of Health CareGlobal HealthMental Health RecoveryMental Health ServicesPandemicsCOVID-19GovernmentHealth PolicyHumansMental HealthOrganizationsSARS-CoV-2At-risk groupsCoronavirusCOVID-19Digital healthcareMental healthMental health policySocial determinants

Identifiers

PMID33823855
PMCPMC8022299
OpenAlexW3110893579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.