Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33823850›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Factors associated with homecare coordination and quality of care: a research protocol for a national multi-center cross-sectional study.

Nathalie Möckli, Michael Simon, Carla Meyer-Massetti, Sandrine Pihet, Roland Fischer, Matthias Wächter, Christine Serdaly, Franziska Zúñiga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nathalie MöckliNursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Michael SimonNursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Carla Meyer-MassettiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Clinical Pharmacy & Epidemiology, c/o University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 26, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Sandrine PihetUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, School of Nursing, Route des Arsenaux 16a, CH-1700, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Roland FischerCentre for Primary Health Care, University of Basel, Rheinstrasse 26, CH-4410, Liestal, Switzerland.
Matthias WächterInstitute for Business and Regional Economics IBR, Lucerne University, Zentralstrasse 9, CH-6002, Luzern, Switzerland.
Christine Serdalyserdaly&ankers snc, Route de Florissant 210, CH-1231, Conches, Switzerland.
Franziska ZúñigaNursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland. franziska.zuniga@unibas.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8844-4903

Funding

Nursing Science Foundation Switzerland ID 3003-2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe persistent fragmentation of home healthcare reflects inadequate coordination between care providers. Still, while factors at the system (e.g., regulations) and organisational (e.g., work environment) levels crucially influence homecare organisation, coordination and ultimately quality, knowledge of these factors and their relationships in homecare settings remains limited.

objectivesThis study has three aims: [1] to explore how system-level regulations lead to disparities between homecare agencies' structures, processes and work environments; [2] to explore how system- and organisation-level factors affect agency-level homecare coordination; and [3] to explore how agency-level care coordination is related to patient-level quality of care. DESIGN AND

methodsThis study focuses on a national multi-center cross-sectional survey in Swiss homecare settings. It will target 100 homecare agencies, their employees and clients for recruitment, with data collection period planned from January to June 2021. We will assess regulations and financing mechanisms (via public records), agency characteristics (via agency questionnaire data) and homecare employees' working environments and coordination activities, as well as staff- and patient-level perceptions of coordination and quality of care (via questionnaires for homecare employees, clients and informal caregivers). All collected data will be subjected to descriptive and multi-level analyses. DISCUSSION: The first results are expected by December 2021. Knowledge of factors linked to quality of care is essential to plan and implement quality improvement strategies. This study will help to identify modifiable factors at multiple health system levels that might serve as access points to improve coordination and quality of care.

Indexed as

Home Care AgenciesHome Care ServicesCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesCare coordinationDelivery of health careHealth services researchHome care servicesNursing administration researchQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID33823850
PMCPMC8025374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.