ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021
Radiological tarsal bone morphology in adolescent age of congenital clubfeet treated with the Ponseti method.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical and radiographic evaluation of Ponseti method for neonate congenital clubfoot.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMajor abnormalities of tarsal bone shape after surgical clubfoot treatment are well known from the literature. The Ponseti method has gained widespread acceptance in primary treatment of congenital clubfeet. Despite the longtime experience, data regarding the development of tarsal bones after this treatment are still rare. The aim of the study was therefore to evaluate radiographic parameters describing tarsal bone shape of clubfeet after Ponseti treatment and compare them to age-matched healthy feet.
methodsTwenty two consecutive severe clubfeet in 14 patients were investigated by repeated diagnostic ultrasound during the corrective process. Extent and temporal course of correction were documented with standardized X-rays after a mean follow-up of 12 years (between the ages of 10-14 years) and compared to a group of age-matched normal feet.
resultsReliability testing for all X-ray parameters showed good to excellent results. In comparison to the control group, all parameters except the radius of the trochlea (RT) were significantly altered in clubfeet with highest differences shown for the anterior talar motion segment (ATM), talonavicular coverage (TNC) and the talometatarsal index (TMT-Index). Differentiation between minor and major deformities showed significant differences only for the front tarsal index (FTI).
conclusionsTarsal bone shape of clubfeet treated by the Ponseti method differs significantly from normal feet. One of the most pronounced and clinically relevant difference of the clubfoot talus compared to the normal talus is the markedly reduced anterior talar motion segment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.