Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33823831›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2021

COVID-19 outbreak and acute cholecystitis in a Hub Hospital in Milan: wider indications for percutaneous cholecystostomy.

Matteo Barabino, Gaetano Piccolo, Arianna Trizzino, Veronica Fedele, Carlo Ferrari, Vincenzo Nicastro, Andrea Pisani Ceretti, Enrico De Nicola, Nicolò Maria Mariani, Marco Giovenzana and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matteo BarabinoUnit of HepatoBilioPancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Department of Health Science, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Via Di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Gaetano PiccoloUnit of HepatoBilioPancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Department of Health Science, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Via Di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Arianna TrizzinoUnit of HepatoBilioPancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Department of Health Science, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Via Di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Veronica FedeleUnit of HepatoBilioPancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Department of Health Science, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Via Di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Carlo FerrariUnit of HepatoBilioPancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Department of Health Science, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Via Di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy. carlo.ferrari1@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5118-2340
Vincenzo NicastroUnit of HepatoBilioPancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Department of Health Science, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Via Di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Andrea Pisani CerettiUnit of HepatoBilioPancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Department of Health Science, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Via Di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Enrico De NicolaUnit of HepatoBilioPancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Department of Health Science, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Via Di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Nicolò Maria MarianiUnit of HepatoBilioPancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Department of Health Science, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Via Di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Marco GiovenzanaUnit of HepatoBilioPancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Department of Health Science, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Via Di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Giovanna ScifoUnit of HepatoBilioPancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Department of Health Science, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Via Di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Massimiliano MazzaUnit of HepatoBilioPancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Department of Health Science, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Via Di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Ruggero VercelliDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Via Di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Roberto SantambrogioUnit of General Surgery, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Piazza Principessa Clotilde 3, 20121, Milan, Italy.
Carmelo LuigianoUnit of Digestive Endoscopy, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Via Di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Enrico OpocherUnit of HepatoBilioPancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Department of Health Science, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Via Di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 pandemic has impacted the Italian National Health Care system at many different levels, causing a complete reorganization of surgical wards. In this context, our study retrospectively analysed the management strategy for patients with acute cholecystitis.

methodsWe analysed all patients admitted to our Emergency Department for acute cholecystitis between February and April 2020 and we graded each case according to 2018 Tokyo Guidelines. All patients were tested for positivity to SARS-CoV-2 and received an initial conservative treatment. We focused on patients submitted to cholecystostomy during the acute phase of pandemic and their subsequent disease evolution.

resultsThirty-seven patients were admitted for acute cholecystitis (13 grade I, 16 grade II, 8 grade III). According to Tokyo Guidelines (2018), patients were successfully treated with antibiotic only, bedside percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in 29.7%, 21.6% and 48.7% of cases respectively. Therapeutic strategy of three out of 8 cases, otherwise fit for surgery, submitted to bedside percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (37.5%), were directly modified by COVID-19 pandemic: one due to the SARS-CoV-2 positivity, while two others due to unavailability of operating room and intensive care unit for post-operative monitoring respectively. Overall success rate of percutaneous cholecystostomy was of 87.5%. The mean post-procedural hospitalization length was 9 days, and no related adverse events were observed apart from transient parietal bleeding, conservatively treated. Once discharged, two patients required readmission because of acute biliary symptoms. Median time of drainage removal was 43 days and only 50% patients thereafter underwent cholecystectomy.

conclusionsPercutaneous cholecystostomy has shown to be an effective and safe treatment thus acquiring an increased relevance in the first phase of the pandemic. Nowadays, considering we are forced to live with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, PC should be considered as a virtuous, alternative tool for potentially all COVID-19 positive patients and selectively for negative cases unresponsive to conservative therapy and unfit for surgery.

Indexed as

Cholecystitis, AcuteCOVID-19Disease OutbreaksCholecystostomyHospitalsHumansItalyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAcute cholecystitisBedsideCOVID-19DrainagePercutaneous cholecystostomySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33823831
PMCPMC8022294
OpenAlexW3138356006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.