Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33823830›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2021

Assessment of operator performance during oocyte retrievals: residents' learning curve and continuous monitoring of senior physicians.

C Verhaeghe, H El Hachem, L Inchboard, R Corroenne, C Dreux, P Jeanneteau, G Legendre, P Descamps, P Saulnier, P May-Panloup and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

C VerhaegheDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Angers University Hospital, 49000, Angers, France. verhaeghe.caroline@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9946-5697
H El HachemDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Clemenceau Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
L InchboardClinical Research Center, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
R CorroenneDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Angers University Hospital, 49000, Angers, France.
C DreuxDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Angers University Hospital, 49000, Angers, France.
P JeanneteauDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Angers University Hospital, 49000, Angers, France.
G LegendreDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Angers University Hospital, 49000, Angers, France.
P DescampsDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Angers University Hospital, 49000, Angers, France.
P SaulnierClinical Research Center, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
P May-PanloupDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Angers University Hospital, 49000, Angers, France.
P E BouetDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Angers University Hospital, 49000, Angers, France.
Université d'Angers · FRAmerican University of Beirut Medical Center · LB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe learning curve cumulative summation test (LC CUSUM test) allows to define an individualized learning curve and determine the moment when clinical proficiency is attained. After acquisition of the skills, the cumulative summation test (CUSUM test) allows to monitor the maintenance of the required level over time. The LC CUSUM test has been frequently used in the field of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn) for several procedures, but only once for OR.

methodsWe performed a retrospective study at Angers university hospital between May 2017 and September 2018. Seven Ob/Gyn residents and 5 senior physicians were included, and all OR performed during that time (n = 690) were analyzed. The performance index assessed was the oocyte retrieval rate (ORR), defined as the ratio of oocytes retrieved to follicles aspirated. We used the LC CUSUM test to analyze the learning curves of residents, and the CUSUM test to monitor the performance of senior physicians. An ORR ≥50% in 60% of retrievals was defined as the threshold for clinical proficiency.

resultsSix hundred seventy-four oocyte retrieval (OR) were included: 315 were performed by residents, 220 by senior physicians, and 139 by both residents and physicians (mixed retrievals). Four residents (57%) reached the threshold after aspirating 82, 67, 53 and 46 ovaries, respectively. The mean number of ovaries aspirated in order to reach clinical proficiency was 62, and the mean number of weeks needed was 21. The duration of the learning period varied between 26 and 80 days. Two senior physicians (40%) remained proficient across the duration of the study, while two physicians (40%) had one statistically "suboptimal" OR, and one physician (20%) had two suboptimal retrievals.

conclusionThere is a large variability in the duration of the learning period and the number of procedures needed for a resident to master OR. Senior physicians maintain an adequate performance.

Indexed as

Learning CurvePhysiciansClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansOocyte RetrievalPregnancyRetrospective StudiesCUSUM testLC CUSUM testLearning curveOocyte retrievalPerformance

Identifiers

PMID33823830
PMCPMC8025573
OpenAlexW3147476072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.