Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33823805›Full record

ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2021

New Guinean orogenic dynamics and biota evolution revealed using a custom geospatial analysis pipeline.

Emmanuel F A Toussaint, Lloyd T White, Helena Shaverdo, Athena Lam, Suriani Surbakti, Rawati Panjaitan, Bob Sumoked, Thomas von Rintelen, Katayo Sagata, Michael Balke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emmanuel F A Toussaint *Natural History Museum of Geneva, CP 6434, 1211, Geneva 6, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8439-1285
Lloyd T White *GeoQuEST Research Centre, School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1829-0881
Helena ShaverdoNaturhistorisches Museum Wien, Burgring 7, 1010, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5034-7342
Athena LamSNSB-Zoologische Staatssammlung München, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7782-6041
Suriani SurbaktiDepartment of Biology, Universitas Cenderawasih (UNCEN), Waena, Papua, Indonesia.
Rawati PanjaitanDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, State University of Papua (UNIPA), Jalan Gunung Salju Amban, Manokwari, 98314, West Papua, Indonesia.
Bob SumokedWalian 2, Tomohon Selatan, 95439, N Sulawesi, Indonesia.
Thomas von RintelenMuseum Für Naturkunde - Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstraße 43, 10115, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6253-3078
Katayo SagataUniversity of Papua New Guinea, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Michael Balke *SNSB-Zoologische Staatssammlung München, Munich, Germany. balke.m@snsb.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3773-6586

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 24312Austrian Science Fund FWF P 31347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe New Guinean archipelago has been shaped by millions of years of plate tectonic activity combined with long-term fluctuations in climate and sea level. These processes combined with New Guinea's location at the tectonic junction between the Australian and Pacific plates are inherently linked to the evolution of its rich endemic biota. With the advent of molecular phylogenetics and an increasing amount of geological data, the field of New Guinean biogeography begins to be reinvigorated.

resultsWe inferred a comprehensive dated molecular phylogeny of endemic diving beetles to test historical hypotheses pertaining to the evolution of the New Guinean biota. We used geospatial analysis techniques to compare our phylogenetic results with a newly developed geological terrane map of New Guinea as well as the altitudinal and geographic range of species ( https://arcg.is/189zmz ). Our divergence time estimations indicate a crown age (early diversification) for New Guinea Exocelina beetles in the mid-Miocene ca. 17 Ma, when the New Guinean orogeny was at an early stage. Geographic and geological ancestral state reconstructions suggest an origin of Exocelina ancestors on the eastern part of the New Guinean central range on basement rocks (with a shared affinity with the Australian Plate). Our results do not support the hypothesis of ancestors migrating to the northern margin of the Australian Plate from Pacific terranes that incrementally accreted to New Guinea over time. However, our analyses support to some extent a scenario in which Exocelina ancestors would have been able to colonize back and forth between the amalgamated Australian and Pacific terranes from the Miocene onwards. Our reconstructions also do not support an origin on ultramafic or ophiolite rocks that have been colonized much later in the evolution of the radiation. Macroevolutionary analyses do not support the hypothesis of heterogeneous diversification rates throughout the evolution of this radiation, suggesting instead a continuous slowdown in speciation.

conclusionsOverall, our geospatial analysis approach to investigate the links between the location and evolution of New Guinea's biota with the underlying geology sheds a new light on the patterns and processes of lineage diversification in this exceedingly diverse region of the planet.

Indexed as

ColeopteraAnimalsAustraliaBiotaNew GuineaPhylogenyBeetle evolutionDytiscidae paleogeographyFoja Gauttier MountainsIsland biogeographyMelanesiaUltramafic rocksWater beetle phylogenetics

Identifiers

PMID33823805
PMCPMC8022562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.