Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33823696›Full record

ArticlePalliative medicine2021

Size and composition of family networks of decedents: A nationwide register-based study.

Marie S Kristensen, Lau C Thygesen, Djin L Tay, Raj Kumar, Mogens Grønvold, Melissa Aldridge, Katherine A Ornstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Off the Grid: Reaching the Most Socially Isolated Among Us.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Solo but Not Alone: An Examination of Social and Help Networks among Community-Dwelling Older Adults without Close Family.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marie S KristensenNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lau C ThygesenNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Djin L TayCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5247-0010
Raj KumarDepartment of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Mogens GrønvoldDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Melissa AldridgeDepartment of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Katherine A OrnsteinDepartment of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Downstream effects of end-of-life patient treatment intensity on family membersK01AG047923 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI ORNSTEIN, KATHERINE A · 2014 to 2018
$581k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG047923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeriously ill individuals rely heavily on family caregivers at the end of life. Yet many do not have family support.

aimTo characterize the size and composition of decedents' family networks by cause of death, demographic, clinical, socioeconomic, and geographic characteristics.

designA cross-sectional population-level study with data collected from nation-wide registers. SETTING/

participantsAll adults in Denmark born between 1935 and 1998 who died of natural causes between 2009 and 2016 were linked at the time of death to living adult spouses/partners, children, siblings, parents, and grandchildren.

resultsAmong 175,755 decedents (median age: 68 years, range: 18-81 years), 61% had a partner at the time of death and 78% had at least one adult child. Ten percent of decedents had no identified living adult family members. Decedents with family had a median of five relatives. Males were more likely to have a spouse/partner (65%) than females (56%). While 93% of decedents dying of cancer had adult family, only 70% of individuals dying of dementia had adult family at the time of death. The majority of cancer decedents co-resided or lived within 30 km of family (88%), compared to only 65% of those dying from psychiatric illness.

conclusionsWhile the majority of adults had an extensive family network at the time of death, a substantial proportion of decedents had no family, suggesting the need for non-family based long-term service and support systems. Assessment of family networks can expand our understanding of the end-of-life caregiving process and inform palliative care delivery.

Indexed as

Terminal CareAdultAdult ChildrenAgedCaregiversChildCross-Sectional StudiesFamilyFemaleHumansMalePalliative CarebereavementcaregiversfamilyRegistries

Identifiers

PMID33823696
PMCPMC12422409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.