Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33823082›Full record

Observational studyThe oncologist2021

Adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network ALK Testing Guidelines for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in U.S. Community Medical Centers.

Eric H Bernicker, Yan Xiao, Anup Abraham, Baiyu Yang, Denise A Croix, Stella Redpath, Julia Engstrom-Melnyk, Roma Shah, Jaya Madala, Timothy C Allen

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Testing forOncoTargets and therapy · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eric H BernickerCancer Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0829-2111
Yan XiaoRoche Diagnostics Information Solutions, Pleasanton, California, USA.
Anup AbrahamGenesis Research, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.
Baiyu YangRoche Diagnostics Information Solutions, Pleasanton, California, USA.
Denise A CroixRoche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7830-6013
Stella RedpathRoche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Julia Engstrom-MelnykRoche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Roma ShahRoche Diagnostics Information Solutions, Pleasanton, California, USA.
Jaya MadalaRoche Diagnostics Information Solutions, Pleasanton, California, USA.
Timothy C AllenUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend biomarker testing as the first step in the management of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). We assessed anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) testing rates and factors related to underuse in community medical systems between 2012 and 2019 to understand guideline adoption.

methodsA retrospective observational study using a nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived deidentified database was conducted. Patients with aNSCLC diagnosed in community medical centers from January 2012 to May 2019 were included to describe the ALK testing trend. This cohort was further restricted to patients diagnosed after 2015 to understand factors associated with testing underuse using mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression models.

resultsTrends for increased ALK testing rates by year were observed in both NCCN guideline-eligible patients (59.5% in 2012 to 84.1% in 2019) and -ineligible patients (15.6% to 50.8%) in a cohort of 41,728 patients. Histology type and smoking status had the greatest impact on test use. Compared with patients with nonsquamous histology and no smoking history, patients with squamous histology and no smoking history (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 7.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.6-10.4), NSCLC histology not otherwise specified (NOS) with smoking history (aOR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.8-4.2); NSCLC NOS/nonsmoker (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.2), and nonsquamous/smoker (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.7) were less likely to be tested. Factors related to underuse also included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, stage at initial diagnosis, and demographics.

conclusionThis analysis of real-world data shows increasing test use by year; however, one fifth of patients eligible for ALK testing still remain untested and potentially missing therapeutic options. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Advancement in treatment of lung cancer is accompanied by an increasing number of tests that should be run to determine potential therapy options for each patient. This study assessed adoption of testing recommendations for anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements in a national database. Although test use increased over the time period studied (2012-2019), there is still room for improvement. Efforts are needed to increase test use in undertested groups, thus enabling eligible patients to benefit from novel lung cancer therapies.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseElectronic Health RecordsHumansRetrospective StudiesAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseALKNCCN guidelinesReal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID33823082
PMCPMC8176985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.