Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33823021›Full record

ReviewThe Plant cell2021

CRISPR screens in plants: approaches, guidelines, and future prospects.

Christophe Gaillochet, Ward Develtere, Thomas B Jacobs

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Plant cell, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. CRISPR-Cas applications in agriculture and plant research.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Small signaling peptides define leaf longevity.Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  12. A micropeptide regulates seed desiccation.Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christophe GaillochetDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent 9052, Belgium.
Ward DeveltereDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent 9052, Belgium.
Thomas B JacobsDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent 9052, Belgium.
VIB-UGent Center for Plant Systems Biology · BEGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-associated systems have revolutionized genome engineering by facilitating a wide range of targeted DNA perturbations. These systems have resulted in the development of powerful new screens to test gene functions at the genomic scale. While there is tremendous potential to map and interrogate gene regulatory networks at unprecedented speed and scale using CRISPR screens, their implementation in plants remains in its infancy. Here we discuss the general concepts, tools, and workflows for establishing CRISPR screens in plants and analyze the handful of recent reports describing the use of this strategy to generate mutant knockout collections or to diversify DNA sequences. In addition, we provide insight into how to design CRISPR knockout screens in plants given the current challenges and limitations and examine multiple design options. Finally, we discuss the unique multiplexing capabilities of CRISPR screens to investigate redundant gene functions in highly duplicated plant genomes. Combinatorial mutant screens have the potential to routinely generate higher-order mutant collections and facilitate the characterization of gene networks. By integrating this approach with the numerous genomic profiles that have been generated over the past two decades, the implementation of CRISPR screens offers new opportunities to analyze plant genomes at deeper resolution and will lead to great advances in functional and synthetic biology.

Indexed as

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGene Knockout TechniquesHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysMutationPlantsPlants, Genetically ModifiedPopulation DensityRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems

Identifiers

PMID33823021
PMCPMC8226290
OpenAlexW3080158858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.