Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33822916›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2021

Long-term variation in skeletal muscle and adiposity in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Piers R Boshier, Fredrik Klevebro, Wesley Jenq, Francesco Puccetti, Keerthini Muthuswamy, George B Hanna, Donald E Low

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Changes in Components of Sarcopenia Diagnostic Criteria Throughout the Surgical Treatment of Oesophagogastric Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Piers R BoshierDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Fredrik KlevebroDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Wesley JenqDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Francesco PuccettiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Keerthini MuthuswamyDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
George B HannaDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Donald E LowDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Virginia Mason Medical Center · USImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study seeks to define long-term variation in body composition in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer and to associate those changes with survival. Assessment of skeletal muscle, visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) was performed using computed tomography (CT) images routinely acquired: at diagnosis; after neoadjuvant therapy, and; >6 months after esophagectomy. In cases where multiple CT scans were performed >6 months after surgery, all available images were assessed. Ninty-seven patients met inclusion criteria with a median of 2 (range 1-10) postoperative CT images acquired between 0.5 and 9.7 years after surgery. Following surgical treatment of esophageal cancer, patients lost on average 13.3% of their skeletal muscle, 64.5% of their VAT and 44.2% of their SAT. Sarcopenia at diagnosis was not associated with worse overall survival (66.3% vs. 68.5%; P = 0.331). Sarcopenia 1 year after esophagectomy was however associated with lower 5-year overall survival (53.8% vs. 87.5%; P = 0.019). Survival was lower in those patients who had >10% decrease in skeletal muscle index (SMI; 33.3% vs. 72.1%; P = 0.003) and >40% decrease in SAT 1 year after surgery (40.4% vs. 67.4%; P = 0.015). On multivariate analysis, a decline in SMI 1 year after surgery was predictive of worse survival (HR 0.38, 95%CI 0.20-0.73; P = 0.004). This study provides new insight relating to long-term variation in body composition in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer. Findings provide further evidence of the importance of body composition, in particular depletion of skeletal muscle, in predicting survival following esophagectomy.

Indexed as

EsophagectomySarcopeniaAdiposityHumansMuscle, SkeletalPrognosisRetrospective Studiesadipositybody compositionesophagectomysarcopeniaskeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID33822916
PMCPMC8597909
OpenAlexW3148062806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.