Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33822780›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2021

Human protection drives the emergence of a new coping style in animals.

Bastien Sadoul, Daniel T Blumstein, Sébastien Alfonso, Benjamin Geffroy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bastien SadoulESE, Ecology and Ecosystem Health, Institut Agro, INRAE, Rennes, France.
Daniel T BlumsteinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Sébastien AlfonsoCOISPA Tecnologia & Ricerca, Stazione Sperimentale per lo Studio delle Risorse del Mare, Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2471-2876
Benjamin GeffroyMARBEC, Univ. Montpellier, Ifremer, IRD, CNRS, Palavas-Les-Flots, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6120-1103

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wild animals face novel environmental threats from human activities that may occur along a gradient of interactions with humans. Recent work has shown that merely living close to humans has major implications for a variety of antipredator traits and physiological responses. Here, we hypothesize that when human presence protects prey from their genuine predators (as sometimes seen in urban areas and at some tourist sites), this predator shield, followed by a process of habituation to humans, decouples commonly associated traits related to coping styles, which results in a new range of phenotypes. Such individuals are characterized by low aggressiveness and physiological stress responses, but have enhanced behavioral plasticity, boldness, and cognitive abilities. We refer to these individuals as "preactive," because their physiological and behavioral coping style falls outside the classical proactive/reactive coping styles. While there is some support for this new coping style, formal multivariate studies are required to investigate behavioral and physiological responses to anthropogenic activities.

Indexed as

Human-Animal InteractionAdaptation, PsychologicalAggressionAnimalsAnimals, WildBehavior, AnimalConservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmentHuman ActivitiesHumansPredatory BehaviorStress, PhysiologicalStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID33822780
PMCPMC8057586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.