Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33822750›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2021

Standardization of histogram- and gray-level co-occurrence matrices-based radiomics in the presence of blur and noise.

Grace J Gang, Radhika Deshpande, J Webster Stayman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Invariant Texture Features to Gray Level Discretization.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Recovery of GLRLM Features in Degraded Images using Deep Learning and Image Property Models.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. End-to-end Deep Learning Restoration of GLCM Features from blurred and noisy images.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Grace J GangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3882-0210
Radhika DeshpandeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, United States of America.
J Webster StaymanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, United States of America.

Funding

Framework for radiomics standardization with application in pulmonary CT scansR01EB031592 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GANG, JIANAN GRACE, STAYMAN, JOSEPH WEBSTER · 2022 to 2025
$2.6M
Nonlinear performance analysis and prediction for robust low dose lung CTR01CA249538 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GANG, JIANAN GRACE · 2021 to 2024
$2.0M
Prior-image-based CT reconstruction for low-dose lung cancer screeningR21CA219608 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI STAYMAN, JOSEPH WEBSTER · 2017 to 2018
$391k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA249538NCI NIH HHS R21 CA219608NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiomics have been extensively investigated as quantitative biomarkers that can enhance the utility of imaging studies and aid the clinical decision making process. A major challenge to the clinical translation of radiomics is their variability as a result of different imaging and reconstruction protocols. In this work, we present a novel radiomics standardization framework capable of modeling and recovering the underlying radiomic feature in images that have been corrupted by the effects of spatial resolution and noise. We focus on two classes of radiomics based on pixel value distributions-i.e. histograms and gray-level co-occurrence matrices (GLCMs). We developed a model that predicts these distributions in the presence of system blur and noise, and used that model to invert these physical effects and recover the underlying distributions. Specifically, the effect of blur on histogram and GLCM is highly image-dependent, while additive noise convolves the histogram/GLCM of the noiseless image with those of the noise. The recovery method therefore consists of two deconvolution operations: the first in the image domain to remove the effect of system blur, the second in the histogram/GLCM domain to remove the effect of noise. The performance of the proposed recovery strategy was investigated using a set of texture phantoms and an emulated computed tomography imaging chain with a range of realistic blur and noise levels. The proposed method was able to obtain histogram and GLCM estimates that closely resemble the ground truth. The method performed well across imaging conditions and significantly lowered the variability associated with different imaging protocols. This improvement also translated to better classification accuracy, where recovered radiomic values result in greater separation of radiomic clusters for two different texture phantoms as compared to values derived from the original blurred and noisy images. In summary, the novel radiomics standardization framework demonstrates high potential for mitigating radiomic variability as a result of the imaging system and can potentially be integrated as a preprocessing step towards more robust and reproducible radiomic models.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedHumansPhantoms, ImagingReference Standards

Identifiers

PMID33822750
PMCPMC8607458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.