ArticleCancer research2021
Which Holds the Key to BRCAness: Inability to Repair the Break, Protect the Fork, or Prevent the Gap?
Article in Cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pathway for the Development of ATR Inhibitors in Pediatric Malignancies: An ACCELERATE Multistakeholder Analysis.JCO precision oncology · 2026Review
- Human TLS DNA polymerase: saviors or threats under replication stress?Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
- The functional impact of BRCA1 BRCT domain variants using multiplexed DNA double-strand break repair assays.American journal of human genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Defects in genes crucial for the process of DNA repair by homology-directed DNA repair (HDR), such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, are well-known contributors to cancer pathogenesis as well as an Achilles' heel that can be exploited therapeutically. BRCA1/2-deficient cells are exquisitely sensitive to agents that stall replication forks, such as PARP inhibitors and platinating drugs, presumably due to the inability to repair double-stranded breaks that form as a consequence of replication fork collapse. BRCA1/2 also promote tolerance to DNA replication stress by protecting replication forks from nucleolytic degradation. Both biological endpoints involve the deposition of RAD51 onto single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) for homology searching and strand exchange during HDR repair, as well as protection of newly synthesized DNA from nucleolytic degradation (i.e., replication fork protection). In this issue of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.