Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33822478›Full record

ReviewPharmacology research & perspectives2021

The antimicrobial effect behind Cannabis sativa.

Laureano Schofs, Mónica D Sparo, Sergio F Sánchez Bruni

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Anti-Infective Screening of Selected Nine Cannabinoids AgainstCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. In vitro antimicrobial activity of Thai stick cannabis Hang Kra Rog Phu Phan (Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laureano SchofsLaboratory of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Tandil, Argentina.
Mónica D SparoTandil Veterinary Research Center (CIVETAN), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Comisión de investigaciones científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (CICPBA), Tandil, Argentina.
Sergio F Sánchez BruniLaboratory of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Tandil, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-9598-6786
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of multidrug-resistant bacteria has revealed the need for new antimicrobial compounds. Cannabis sativa preparations have a long history of medical applications, including the treatment of infectious diseases. This review collects the information about the activity of C. sativa extracts and its main components (cannabinoids and terpenes) against pathogenic bacteria and fungus, to assess its potential using as antimicrobial agents.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsCannabinoidsCannabisCell MembraneCell Membrane PermeabilityDisease Models, AnimalDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialDrug SynergismHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPlant ExtractsTerpenesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCannabinoidsPlant ExtractsTerpenesantimicrobial activitycannabinoidsCannabis sativaterpenes

Identifiers

PMID33822478
PMCPMC8023331
OpenAlexW3141935721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.