Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33822319›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2021

Non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas: factors affecting postoperative recurrence, and pre- and post-surgical endocrine and visual function.

Venkatram Subramanian, Rachel Su Min Lee, Simon Howell, Samuel Gregson, Ian M Lahart, Kalpana Kaushal, Joseph M Pappachan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. scRNA sequencing technology for PitNET studies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Venkatram Subramanian *Department of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Royal Preston Hospital, The Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.
Rachel Su Min Lee *The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Simon HowellDepartment of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Royal Preston Hospital, The Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.
Samuel GregsonDepartment of Neuroradiology, Royal Preston Hospital, The Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.
Ian M LahartFaculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Walsall, UK.
Kalpana KaushalDepartment of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Royal Preston Hospital, The Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.
Joseph M PappachanDepartment of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Royal Preston Hospital, The Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK. drpappachan@yahoo.co.in.ORCID 0000-0003-0886-5255
Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBManchester Metropolitan University · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Wolverhampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-functioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFPAs) with visual field defects are ideally managed by transsphenoidal tumour resection to improve vision, and long-term postsurgical follow up is necessary to monitor for tumour recurrence. Regular updates from global data are necessary for developing optimal management strategies of these tumours.

methodsPre- and postoperative visual and endocrine profile, imaging characteristics and details of surgical interventions among patients with NFPAs managed between 2008 and 2019 in a UK regional centre were assessed. The radiological and surgical outcomes including postoperative complications, recurrence risk and the factors influencing outcomes also were assessed.

results105 cases with mean (SD) age 60.1 (14.3) years and follow-up duration 60 (37) months were studied. 67 (64%) patients were male. Five-year recurrence-free survival rate was 71.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 62.7% to 81.6%) with 33 (31%) tumour recurrences of whom 20 (60%) received radiotherapy and 9 (27%) underwent further surgery. Younger age, tumour volume, and bilateral cavernous sinus extension were the predictors of recurrence on univariate analysis, while younger age was the only factor on multivariate analysis (Hazard ratio 0.95; 95% CI: 0.92, 0.97). 72/78 patients (92%) with preoperative visual field defects improved after surgery, of whom 27 (35%) had full recovery. 20 (24%) patients had recovery of an abnormal hormone axis. 15 patients (16%) developed perioperative complications such as cerebrospinal fluid leak (12 cases), meningitis (2 cases), and bleeding (2 cases).

conclusionsFive-year recurrence-free survival after transsphenoidal resection for NFPAs was 71.5% with older age at surgery conferring lower risk of recurrence. Visual recovery/ improvement occurred in 92% of cases with preoperative visual defects following surgery.

Indexed as

AdenomaPituitary NeoplasmsAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVision, OcularNon-functioning pituitary macroadenoma (NFPA)Recurrence-free survivalTranssphenoidal resectionVisual field defect

Identifiers

PMID33822319
OpenAlexW3149372103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.