ArticleHNO2022
[Interdisciplinary surgery to the central skull base-current status].
Article in HNO, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe skull base is a surgically complex unit and is often only accessible via combined access routes. Newly developed surgical techniques using microsurgical visualization procedures and active instruments ("powered instruments") as well as multiport accesses enable new, less traumatic surgical corridors. This requires close interdisciplinary cooperation between ENT and neurosurgeons. Currently established access routes to the central skull base are systematized based on the authors' own clinical experience, and discussed in relation to the entity and the current study situation. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective, qualitative, and descriptive evaluation of the surgical reports of patients with pathologies of the central skull base who were jointly treated by neurosurgery and otorhinolaryngologic/head and neck surgery between 2006 and 2019 was performed.
resultsThe surgical access routes to the central skull base can be categorized as so-called multiport access routes, partly also in combination, as follows: transnasal-transsphenoidal, subfrontal, subtemporal, transzygomatic, transpterygonal, transpetrous, translabyrinthine, and suboccipital. The choice of access route was based on the location and type of pathology, its inflammatory or space-occupying (benign or malignant tumor) nature, and the possibilities of functional preservation and complete removal.
conclusionDue to the complexity of central skull base structures, the different tumor entities, and the required expertise of different medical specialties, surgery of the central skull base remains a challenge and should only be performed at special competence centers certified according to the criteria of the German Society of Skull Base Surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.