Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33822253›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2021

[Relevant mutations in predictive breast cancer pathology].

Hans H Kreipe, P Sinn

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular pathology in breast disease: diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic tools.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hans H KreipeInstitut für Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. Kreipe.Hans@MH-Hannover.de.
P SinnInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Heidelberg University · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whereas predictive immunohistochemistry has represented a core element of breast cancer classification for decades, predictive molecular pathology, with the exception of in situ hybridization for assessment of HER2 amplification, has only recently gained importance because novel drugs have been approved for treatment of metastatic disease. For the use of PARP inhibitors, proof of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation is mandatory. When mutation of the catalytic subunit α of the phosphatidylinositol‑4.5‑bisphosphate 3‑kinase gene (PIK3CA) is present, which can be encountered in up to 40% of luminal breast cancers, the option for treatment with the specific inhibitor alpelisib arises. The HER2 -encoded growth factor receptor contributes to neoplastic transformation not only by amplification and overexpression but also by activating the mutation of the kinase domain, which is responsive to tyrosine kinase inhibitors of the tucatinib/neratinib type. Up to 30% of metastatic and endocrine treated luminal breast cancers acquire an activating mutation of the estrogen receptor gene ESR1, resulting in an autocrine and ligand-independent growth stimulation resistant to aromatase inhibitors. Larotrectinib-sensitive mutation of tropomyosinreceptor kinase is present in up to 50% of secretory breast cancers, whereas the other histologic subtypes display an incidence of below 1%. In conclusion, predictive molecular pathology has gained importance in metastatic breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMutationOxazolesPyridinesQuinazolinesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesOxazolesPyridinesQuinazolinestucatinibBRCA1/2ERBB2ESR1Estrogen receptorsPIK3CA

Identifiers

PMID33822253
OpenAlexW3143418696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.