Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33822245›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2021

Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in respiratory samples in children with neurodisability-to treat or not to treat?

Elizabeth Gregson, Lowri Thomas, Heather E Elphick

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. An observational study ofERJ open research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth GregsonDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Lowri ThomasDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Heather E ElphickDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK. h.elphick@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8982-9250
Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective was to investigate the prevalence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) in patients with complex neurodisability and current treatment practice in our centre in order to inform future guidelines. A retrospective case note review was undertaken at a tertiary children's hospital. One hundred sixty-two patients (mean age 11.7 years) with a primary diagnosis of neuromuscular disease (NMD) or severe cerebral palsy (CP) and a respiratory sample sent for analysis during the study period were studied. Associations between PA in respiratory samples and diagnosis, long-term ventilation, presence of a gastrostomy or a tracheostomy, antibiotic choice, clinical deterioration and adverse events were analysed. Twenty-five (15%) had one or more PA isolate in respiratory samples. There was a significant association between PA in respiratory samples and tracheostomy (p<0.05). In 52% samples, multiple pathogens co-existed. There was no significant association between choice of antibiotic and clinical outcome but when antibiotics were changed to specific PA antibiotics during the course of the illness, all resulted in clinical improvement. Twenty-six episodes involving 8 patients with recurrent admissions involved PA organisms that were resistant to one or more antibiotics.Conclusions: A larger prospective study may establish clearer criteria for guideline development. Techniques such as point-of-care testing to identify virulent strains of PA may improve patient outcomes and prevent the development of antibiotic resistance in the future. What is Known: •Children with complex neurodisability are at increased risk of respiratory morbidity and of infection with gram-negative organisms such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. •There are currently no guidelines to inform treatment choices in this group of vulnerable children. What is New: •15% children in this study population had Pseudomonas aeruginosa in respiratory samples during a 12-month period, the majority of whom did not require critical care treatment. Thirteen of these children had a tracheostomy in situ and 12 did not.  •In those that deteriorated clinically or developed antibiotic resistant organisms, earlier detection and targeted treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa may have prevented deterioration.

Indexed as

Pseudomonas InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildHumansProspective StudiesPseudomonas aeruginosaRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic resistanceChildNeurodisabilityPoint-of-care testingPseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID33822245
PMCPMC8346391
OpenAlexW3148161236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.