Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33822055›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2021

Is the routine health information system ready to support the planned national health insurance scheme in South Africa?

Edward Nicol, Lyn A Hanmer, Ferdinand C Mukumbang, Wisdom Basera, Andiswa Zitho, Debbie Bradshaw

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Multimorbidity in South Africa: Is the health system ready?Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edward NicolBurden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council. South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6019-9259
Lyn A HanmerBurden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council. South Africa.
Ferdinand C MukumbangBurden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council. South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1441-2172
Wisdom BaseraBurden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council. South Africa.
Andiswa ZithoBurden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council. South Africa.
Debbie BradshawBurden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council. South Africa.
South African Medical Research Council · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementation of a National Health Insurance (NHI) in South Africa requires a reliable, standardized health information system that supports Diagnosis-Related Groupers for reimbursements and resource management. We assessed the quality of inpatient health records, the availability of standard discharge summaries and coded clinical data and the congruence between inpatient health records and discharge summaries in public-sector hospitals to support the NHI implementation in terms of reimbursement and resource management. We undertook a cross-sectional health-records review from 45 representative public hospitals consisting of seven tertiary, 10 regional and 28 district hospitals in 10 NHI pilot districts representing all nine provinces. Data were abstracted from a randomly selected sample of 5795 inpatient health records from the surgical, medical, obstetrics and gynaecology, paediatrics and psychiatry departments. Quality was assessed for 10 pre-defined data elements relevant to NHI reimbursements, by comparing information in source registers, patient folders and discharge summaries for patients admitted in March and July 2015. Cohen's/Fleiss' kappa coefficients (κ) were used to measure agreements between the sources. While 3768 (65%) of the 5795 inpatient-level records contained a discharge summary, less than 835 (15%) of diagnoses were coded using ICD-10 codes. Despite most of the records having correct patient identifiers [κ: 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91-0.93], significant inconsistencies were observed between the registers, patient folders and discharge summaries for some data elements: attending physician's signature (κ: 0.71; 95% CI 0.67-0.75); results of the investigation (κ: 0.71; 95% CI 0.69-0.74); patient's age (κ: 0.72; 95% CI 0.70-0.74); and discharge diagnosis (κ: 0.92; 95% CI 0.90-0.94). The strength of agreement for all elements was statistically significant (P-value ≤ 0.001). The absence of coded inpatient diagnoses and identified data inaccuracies indicates that existing routine health information systems in public-sector hospitals in the NHI pilot districts are not yet able to sufficiently support reimbursements and resource management. Institutional capacity is needed to undertake diagnostic coding, improve data quality and ensure that a standard discharge summary is completed for every inpatient.

Indexed as

Health Information SystemsChildCross-Sectional StudiesHospitals, PublicHumansNational Health ProgramsSouth Africaclinical codingdata qualitydischarge summariesinsurance claimsmorbidity dataNational Health Insurance (NHI)routine health information system (RHIS)South Africa

Identifiers

PMID33822055
PMCPMC8173599
OpenAlexW3146651989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.