Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33821959›Full record

ArticleAnnals of work exposures and health2021

Occupational Exposure to Second-Hand Tobacco Smoke: Development of a Job Exposure Matrix.

Ruaraidh Dobson, Evangelia Demou, Sean Semple

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of work exposures and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ruaraidh DobsonInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8136-8373
Evangelia DemouMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Berkeley Square, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8616-525X
Sean SempleInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0462-7295
University of Stirling · GBMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU13Chief Scientist Office SPHSU17Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/2Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke (SHS) in the workplace has been largely controlled in most workplaces in many countries that have adopted smoke-free laws and regulations. Workers in offices, bars, restaurants, and many other settings have experienced substantial reductions in the frequency and intensity of their exposure to SHS. While current exposure to SHS of most non-smoking adults arises from living with a smoker there are likely to be some jobs where non-negligible exposure to SHS continues to occur. This study describes the development of a simple job exposure matrix (JEM) for SHS exposure for the UK working population in 2020 and identifies that at least 1.04 million workers are likely to be exposed to SHS while performing their job. Occupations with the highest frequency and intensity of exposure include those where workers carry out work tasks in private, domestic settings: including care workers and home carers. This SHS-JEM provides a novel method for assessing occupational exposure to SHS in other countries, and can act as a tool to identify priorities for policies to protect those workers who continue to be at risk from SHS.

Indexed as

Occupational ExposureTobacco Smoke PollutionAdultHumansOccupationsRestaurantsWorkplaceTobacco Smoke Pollutionaerosolsexposure assessmentexposure estimationoccupational groupssmoking

Identifiers

PMID33821959
PMCPMC8675403
OpenAlexW3146969833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.