Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33821937›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2022

Mechanisms of Action in a Behavioral Weight-Management Program: Latent Growth Curve Analysis.

Sarah Bates, Paul Norman, Penny Breeze, Alan Brennan, Amy L Ahern

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah BatesSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6358-0060
Paul NormanDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5892-0470
Penny BreezeSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Alan BrennanSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Amy L AhernMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_EX_MR/J000493/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00006/6Medical Research Council MR/J000493/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 108903/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA greater understanding of the mechanisms of action of weight-management interventions is needed to inform the design of effective interventions. PURPOSE: To investigate whether dietary restraint, habit strength, or diet self-regulation mediated the impact of a behavioral weight-management intervention on weight loss and weight loss maintenance.

methodsLatent growth curve analysis (LGCA) was conducted on trial data in which adults (N = 1,267) with a body mass index (BMI) ≥28 kg/m2 were randomized to either a brief intervention (booklet on losing weight), a 12 week weight-management program or the same program for 52 weeks. LGCA estimated the trajectory of the variables over four time points (baseline and 3, 12 and 24 months) to assess whether potential mechanisms of action mediated the impact of the weight-management program on BMI.

resultsParticipants randomized to the 12 and 52 week programs had a significantly greater decrease in BMI than the brief intervention. This direct effect became nonsignificant when dietary restraint, habit strength, and autonomous diet self-regulation were controlled for. The total indirect effect was significant for both the 12 (estimate = -1.33, standard error [SE] = 0.41, p = .001) and 52 week (estimate = -2.13, SE = 0.52, p < .001) program. Only the individual indirect effect for dietary restraint was significant for the 12 week intervention, whereas all three indirect effects were significant for the 52 week intervention.

conclusionsBehavior change techniques that target dietary restraint, habit strength, and autonomous diet self-regulation should be considered when designing weight loss and weight loss maintenance interventions. Longer interventions may need to target both deliberative and automatic control processes to support successful weight management.

Indexed as

ObesityWeight Reduction ProgramsAdultBehavior TherapyBody Mass IndexDietHumansWeight LossHabitMediationRestraintSelf-regulationWeight management

Identifiers

PMID33821937
PMCPMC8691398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.