ArticleJAMA2021
Antimicrobial Use in a Cohort of US Nursing Homes, 2017.
Article in JAMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Invasive Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis infections in a super-aged society: a Japanese nationwide observational study (2024-2025).BMC infectious diseases · 2026Observational
- Genome sequencing for prevention of health-care-associated bacterial infections.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026Review
- Bridging the Gap: Optimizing OPAT Transitions to Skilled Nursing Facilities.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Trends in antibiotic use in long-term care hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide cohort study during 2020 and 2023.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- A Description of QT-Interval Prolonging Drug Interactions with Fluoroquinolones in Older Women with Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2025Article
- Measurement of antibiotic use in cats and dogs presenting to US primary care and referral practices provides insights for antimicrobial stewardship.Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · 2025Article
- Temporal Trends ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Antibiotic Prescribing for Urinary Tract Infections in Women Residing in Long-Term Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2024Article
- Description of national antibiotic prescribing rates in U.S. long-term care facilities, 2013-2021.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2024Article
- Antibiotic Prescribing in United States Nursing Homes, 2013-2017.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Secular trend analysis of antibiotic utilisation in some hospitals in Southern Sichuan from 2010 to 2020.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Expert consensus on monitoring antimicrobial stewardship in French nursing homes using assessed reimbursement database indicators.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2023Article
- Evaluation of antifungal use in long-term care facilities using pharmacy dispensing data in the USA, 2019.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 Outbreak on the Antibiotic Use Patterns among a Rural Community Population in Eastern China.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Quantifying the breadth of antibiotic exposure in sepsis and suspected infection using spectrum scores.Medicine · 2022Article
- Association of Exposure to High-risk Antibiotics in Acute Care Hospitals With Multidrug-Resistant Organism Burden in Nursing Homes.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Article
- Pattern and Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Prescriptions for Upper Respiratory Tract and Dental Infections in Male Prisoners in Italy.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Antibiotic consumption in long-term care facilities in Poland and other European countries in 2017.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Controlling antimicrobial resistance in health care is a public health priority, although data describing antimicrobial use in US nursing homes are limited. Objective: To measure the prevalence of antimicrobial use and describe antimicrobial classes and common indications among nursing home residents. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional, 1-day point-prevalence surveys of antimicrobial use performed between April 2017 and October 2017, last survey date October 31, 2017, and including 15 276 residents present on the survey date in 161 randomly selected nursing homes from selected counties of 10 Emerging Infections Program (EIP) states. EIP staff reviewed nursing home records to collect data on characteristics of residents and antimicrobials administered at the time of the survey. Nursing home characteristics were obtained from nursing home staff and the Nursing Home Compare website. Exposures: Residence in one of the participating nursing homes at the time of the survey. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence of antimicrobial use per 100 residents, defined as the number of residents receiving antimicrobial drugs at the time of the survey divided by the total number of surveyed residents. Multivariable logistic regression modeling of antimicrobial use and percentages of drugs within various classifications. Results: Among 15 276 nursing home residents included in the study (mean [SD] age, 77.6 [13.7] years; 9475 [62%] women), complete prevalence data were available for 96.8%. The overall antimicrobial use prevalence was 8.2 per 100 residents (95% CI, 7.8-8.8). Antimicrobial use was more prevalent in residents admitted to the nursing home within 30 days before the survey date (18.8 per 100 residents; 95% CI, 17.4-20.3), with central venous catheters (62.8 per 100 residents; 95% CI, 56.9-68.3) or with indwelling urinary catheters (19.1 per 100 residents; 95% CI, 16.4-22.0). Antimicrobials were most often used to treat active infections (77% [95% CI, 74.8%-79.2%]) and primarily for urinary tract infections (28.1% [95% CI, 15.5%-30.7%]). While 18.2% (95% CI, 16.1%-20.1%) were for medical prophylaxis, most often use was for the urinary tract (40.8% [95% CI, 34.8%-47.1%]). Fluoroquinolones were the most common antimicrobial class (12.9% [95% CI, 11.3%-14.8%]), and 33.1% (95% CI, 30.7%-35.6%) of antimicrobials used were broad-spectrum antibiotics. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional survey of a cohort of US nursing homes in 2017, prevalence of antimicrobial use was 8.2 per 100 residents. This study provides information on the patterns of antimicrobial use among these nursing home residents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.