ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2021
Long-term behavioral effects observed in mice chronically exposed to static ultra-high magnetic fields.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic resonance imaging.Science advances · 2026Review
- Ultra-high static magnetic fields altered the embryonic division and development in Caenorhabditis elegans via multipolar spindles.Journal of advanced research · 2025Article
- In vivo imaging of the human brain with the Iseult 11.7-T MRI scanner.Nature methods · 2024Article
- A safety study on ultra‑high or moderate static magnetic fields combined with platycodin D against lung cancer.Oncology letters · 2023Article
- Commissioning of the Iseult CEA 11.7 T whole-body MRI: current status, gradient-magnet interaction tests and first imaging experience.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Review
- Germany's journey toward 14 Tesla human magnetic resonance.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Review
- The State of the Art of Natural Polymer Functionalized FeGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Balance beam crossing times are slower after noise exposure in rats.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2023Article
- Subtle alterations of vestibulomotor functioning in conductive hearing loss.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Regional sex differences in neurochemical profiles of healthy mice measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 9.4 tesla.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Article
- Moderate intensity of static magnetic fields can alter the avoidance behavior and fat storage of Caenorhabditis elegans via serotonin.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Consciousness and inward electromagnetic field interactions.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe primary goal of this study was to investigate whether chronic exposures to ultra-high B
methodsC57BL/6 mice were chronically exposed to 10.5-T or 16.4-T magnetic fields (3-h exposures, two exposure sessions per week, 4 or 8 weeks of exposure). In vivo single-voxel
resultsHippocampal neurochemical profile, cognitive, and basic motor functions were not impaired by chronic magnetic field exposures. However, the balance-beam-walking test and the Morris water-maze testing revealed B
conclusionObserved results suggest that the chronic exposure to a magnetic field as high as 16.4 T may result in long-term impairment of the vestibular system in mice. Although observation of mice may not directly translate to humans, nevertheless, they indicate that studies focused on human safety at very high magnetic fields are necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.