ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2021
When using donor oocytes, does embryo stage matter? An analysis of blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfers using a cryopreserved donor oocyte bank.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOocyte donor in vitro fertilization (IVF) represents an ideal model to study the effects of embryo stage on reproductive success, as embryos come from young women with high-quality oocytes. Our study aimed to determine if embryo transfer stage affected outcomes in oocyte donor IVF, including the common scenario where only a limited number of quality embryos are available after culture.
methodsThis retrospective cohort analyzed anonymous vitrified donor oocyte cycles at a single clinic between 2008 and 2015. Overall, 983 recipients underwent 1178 warming cycles resulting in fresh transfer of one-to-two embryos. Our primary outcome was live birth; secondary outcomes included multiple birth, birthweight, and gestational age. Log binomial regression with cluster-weighted generalized estimating equations were used to calculate adjusted risk ratios (aRR) accounting for recipient age, race, and transfer year.
resultsAmong 132 cleavage and 1046 blastocyst transfer cycles, cleavage transfers were associated with lower probability of live birth (aRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.88). Subgroup analysis focused on cycles with a limited number of quality embryos 3 days post-fertilization (≤2), as clinically these women were most likely to be considered for cleavage transfers. Among these cycles (120 cleavage, 371 blastocyst), cleavage transfers were still associated with lower live birth rates compared to blastocyst (aRR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.87)
conclusionsEven in a donor oocyte model with high-quality oocytes, there was a benefit to extended culture and blastocyst transfer, including when only one-to-two quality embryos were available after early culture. This is possibly owed to improved uterine synchronicity or decreased contractility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.