Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33821427›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2021

Decreased number of p16-positive senescent cells in human endometrium as a marker of miscarriage.

Dimitar Parvanov, Rumiana Ganeva, Nina Vidolova, Georgi Stamenov

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Altered p16International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dimitar ParvanovNadezhda Women's Health Hospital, 3 "Blaga vest" Street, Sofia, Bulgaria. dimparvanov@abv.bg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4992-002X
Rumiana GanevaNadezhda Women's Health Hospital, 3 "Blaga vest" Street, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Nina VidolovaNadezhda Women's Health Hospital, 3 "Blaga vest" Street, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Georgi StamenovNadezhda Women's Health Hospital, 3 "Blaga vest" Street, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Queen Giovanna Hospital · BG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate whether the number of p16-positive cells in the functional layer of the endometrium could be a useful biomarker to identify women with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) at risk of miscarriage.

methodsImmunohistochemical staining was performed in 311 endometrial biopsies taken during mid-luteal phase using antibody against p16

resultsWe found that the percentages of p16-positive glandular and luminal epithelial endometrial cells were significantly higher in patients with live births compared to women with miscarriage (9.3% vs. 2.9%, P < 0.001; and 35.2% vs. 11.7%, P = 0.001, respectively). This tendency was not confirmed in thе stroma. The cut-off values with p16-positive luminal cells lower than 12.5% and p16-positive glandular cells lower than 3.2% could be predictive factors for miscarriage (AUC 0.80 and 0.79; sensitivity 71.3% and 74.5%; specificity 74.2% and 71.2%, respectively).

conclusionA decreased number of senescent p16-positive cells could be involved in the implantation failures and aetiology of recurrent miscarriage. Women with history of RIF with reduced populations of p16-positive cells in the endometrial glandular and luminal epithelium may be at greater risk for unsuccessful implantation and miscarriage. The percentage of p16-positive luminal epithelial cells may be clinically useful as a biomarker of miscarriage.

Indexed as

Cellular SenescenceAbortion, HabitualAdultBulgariaCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Embryo ImplantationEmbryo TransferEndometriumFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansInfertility, FemaleLive BirthMiddle AgedPregnancyProspective StudiesCDKN2A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Cellular senescenceHuman endometriumInfertilityMiscarriagep16+ cells

Identifiers

PMID33821427
PMCPMC8417180
OpenAlexW3140796166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.