Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33821406›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2022

Outcomes of robotically assisted laparoscopic lateral suspension (RALLS) with mesh for anterior and apical prolapse.

Patrick Dällenbach, Milena Alec, Michel Boulvain, Stas Shabanov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Is occult stress urinary incontinence truly "occult"?Gynecology and pelvic medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick DällenbachUrogynecology Unit, Division of Gynecology, Department of Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals, 30 boulevard de la Cluse, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland. patrick.dallenbach@hcuge.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1469-3552
Milena AlecUrogynecology Unit, Division of Gynecology, Department of Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals, 30 boulevard de la Cluse, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland.
Michel BoulvainUrogynecology Unit, Division of Gynecology, Department of Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals, 30 boulevard de la Cluse, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland.
Stas ShabanovUrogynecology Unit, Division of Gynecology, Department of Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals, 30 boulevard de la Cluse, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abdominal sacral colpopexy/hysteropexy is the gold standard for the treatment of vaginal apex support. However, dissection of the promontory may expose to potentially life-threatening complications. To avoid this risk, laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh is an alternative. Robotic assistance may be helpful in both techniques. The objective of our study was to evaluate outcomes of robotically assisted laparoscopic lateral suspension (RALLS) with mesh for anterior and apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP). From March 2012 to January 2018, 59 consecutive patients underwent RALLS using titanized polypropylene mesh. Between August 2017 and September 2019, all patients were contacted to assess outcome. We performed a clinical exam and asked them to complete the patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire. Fifty-four patients (91.5%) were available for follow-up. Mean age was 58.5 years (28.8-79.8). There were no perioperative complications. The mean follow-up was 33.6 months (11.2-74.1).The objective cure rate (no prolapse beyond hymen) and the subjective cure rate (PGI-I ≤ 2) were 83.3% and 77.2%, respectively. Five women (9.3%) were reoperated for POP recurrence. There was no erosion. Of the 20 women complaining of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) preoperatively, 12 (60%) were cured without any additional SUI procedure. Only two women (10%) required TVT for persistent grade 2 SUI. Two women (5.9%) developed de novo SUI, but none of them required an operation. RALLS repair for POP with mesh is safe and effective and may represent an alternative to sacral colpopexy/hysteropexy.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPelvic Organ ProlapseRobotic Surgical ProceduresFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansMiddle AgedSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeVaginaApical prolapseHysteropexyLateral suspension with meshPelvic organ prolapseRobotic surgerySacrocolpopexy

Identifiers

PMID33821406
PMCPMC8960596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.