Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33821402›Full record

Observational studyNeurocritical care2021

Predictors of Family Dissatisfaction with Support During Neurocritical Care Shared Decision-Making.

Urs Weber, Qiang Zhang, Derek Ou, James Garritano, Jennifer Johnson, Nathanial Anderson, Andrea K Knies, Belinda Nhundu, Cynthia Bautista, Kevin B Huang and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurocritical care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Urs WeberYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Qiang ZhangYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Derek OuDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine At Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island, NY, USA.
James GarritanoYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Jennifer JohnsonYale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA.
Nathanial AndersonHill Country Health and Wellness Center, Round Mountain, CA, USA.
Andrea K KniesDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Belinda NhunduYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Cynthia BautistaSchool of Nursing and Health Studies, Fairfield University, Fairfield, CT, USA.
Kevin B HuangHarvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Ana-Maria VranceanuHarvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Jonathan RosandHarvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
David Y HwangYale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA. david.hwang@yale.edu.
Yale University · USYale New Haven Hospital · USHarvard University · USCenter for Neuro-Oncology · USDonald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell · USFairfield University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a critical need to improve support for families making difficult shared decisions about patient care with clinicians in the neuroscience ICU (neuro-ICU). The aim of this study is to identify patient- and family-related factors associated with dissatisfaction with shared decision-making support among families of neuro-critically ill patients.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational cohort study using survey data that had been collected from a consecutive sample of family members of patients in the neuro-ICU (one family member per patient) at two US academic centers. Satisfaction with shared decision-making support on ICU discharge had been measured among family members using one specific Likert scale item on the Family Satisfaction in the ICU 24 survey, a validated survey instrument for families of patients in the ICU. We dichotomized top-box responses for this particular item as an outcome variable and identified available patient- and family-related covariates associated with dissatisfaction (i.e., less than complete satisfaction) via univariate and multivariate analyses.

resultsAmong 355 surveys, 180 (49.5%) of the surveys indicated dissatisfaction with support during decision-making. In a multivariate model, no preexisting characteristics of families or patients ascertainable on ICU admission were predictive of dissatisfaction. However, among family factors determined during the ICU course, experiencing three or fewer formal family meetings (odds ratio 1.93 [confidence interval 1.13-3.31]; p = 0.01) was significantly predictive of dissatisfaction with decisional support in this cohort with an average patient length of stay of 8.6 days (SD 8.4). There was also a trend toward a family's decision to keep a patient as full code, without treatment limitations, being predictive of dissatisfaction (odds ratio 1.80 [confidence interval 0.93-3.51]; p = 0.08).

conclusionsFamily dissatisfaction with neuro-ICU shared decision-making support is not necessarily predicted by any preexisting family or patient variables but appears to correlate with participating in fewer formal family meetings during ICU admission. Future studies to improve family satisfaction with neurocritical care decision-making support should have broad inclusion criteria for participants and should consider promoting frequency of family meetings as a core strategy.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessIntensive Care UnitsDecision MakingDecision Making, SharedFamilyHumansProfessional-Family RelationsRetrospective StudiesDecision-makingEthicsFamily caregiversIntensive carePatient-centered careQuality of health care

Identifiers

PMID33821402
PMCPMC8021441
OpenAlexW3144188062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.