Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33821345›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Longitudinal Study of Psychosocial Outcomes Following Surgery in Women with Unilateral Nonhereditary Breast Cancer.

David W Lim, Helene Retrouvey, Isabel Kerrebijn, Kate Butler, Anne C O'Neill, Tulin D Cil, Toni Zhong, Stefan O P Hofer, David R McCready, Kelly A Metcalfe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. "Peace of Mind" After Mastectomy: A Scoping Review.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. EBCC-13 manifesto: Balancing pros and cons for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David W LimWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. David.Lim@wchospital.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2397-4110
Helene RetrouveyDivision of Plastic Surgery, University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Isabel KerrebijnDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kate ButlerDivision of Plastic Surgery, University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Anne C O'NeillDivision of Plastic Surgery, University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Tulin D CilDepartment of Surgery, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Toni ZhongDivision of Plastic Surgery, University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stefan O P HoferDivision of Plastic Surgery, University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
David R McCreadyDivision of General Surgery, University Health Network (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kelly A MetcalfeWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mount Sinai Hospital · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAWomen's College Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRates of bilateral mastectomy are rising in women with unilateral, nonhereditary breast cancer. We aim to characterize how psychosocial outcomes evolve after breast cancer surgery. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe performed a prospective cohort study of women with unilateral, sporadic stage 0-III breast cancer at University Health Network in Toronto, Canada between 2014 and 2017. Women completed validated psychosocial questionnaires (BREAST-Q, Impact of Event Scale, Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale) preoperatively, and at 6 and 12 months following surgery. Change in psychosocial scores was assessed between surgical groups using linear mixed models, controlling for age, stage, and adjuvant treatments. P < .05 were significant.

resultsA total of 475 women underwent unilateral lumpectomy (42.5%), unilateral mastectomy (38.3%), and bilateral mastectomy (19.2%). There was a significant interaction (P < .0001) between procedure and time for breast satisfaction, psychosocial and physical well-being. Women having unilateral lumpectomy had higher breast satisfaction and psychosocial well-being scores at 6 and 12 months after surgery compared with either unilateral or bilateral mastectomy, with no difference between the latter two groups. Physical well-being declined in all groups over time; scores were not better in women having bilateral mastectomy. While sexual well-being scores remained stable in the unilateral lumpectomy group, scores declined similarly in both unilateral and bilateral mastectomy groups over time. Cancer-related distress, anxiety, and depression scores declined significantly after surgery, regardless of surgical procedure (P < .001).

conclusionsPsychosocial outcomes are not improved with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with unilateral breast cancer. Our data may inform women considering contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammaplastyUnilateral Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMastectomyProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33821345
OpenAlexW3147996203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.