Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33821341›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2021

Chronically ill children's participation and health outcomes in shared decision-making: a scoping review.

R O Wijngaarde, I Hein, J Daams, J B Van Goudoever, D T Ubbink

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Pilot trial of iBDecide: Evaluating an online tool to facilitate shared decision making for adolescents and young adults with ulcerative colitis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Shared Decision-Making. A Primer for Clinicians.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Assessing the Revised Safer Dx InstrumentDiagnosis (Berlin, Germany) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R O WijngaardeAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Room H8-247, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. r.o.wijngaarde@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6605-6363
I HeinChild and Adolescent Psychiatry and de Bascule, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J DaamsMedical Library, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J B Van GoudoeverAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Room H8-247, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
D T UbbinkDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NLAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on the United Nations Conventions on the Rights of the Child (CRC), it is a child's right to participate in all matters concerning its wellbeing. Little is known about chronically and/or critically ill children's participation in pediatric shared decision-making (SDM). We explored medical literature to see if and how these children participate in pediatric SDM. We searched relevant medical databases published between January 2008 and January 2020 for studies targeting children aged 4-18 years old, suffering from a chronic and/or critical disease. We found 9 relevant studies. SDM interventions mostly used were decision aids (n=8), questionnaires for caretakers/parents and children (n=4), and a SDM toolkit (n=2). Perceived involvement in SDM and knowledge increased amongst children, adolescents, and caretakers following these interventions. Decisional conflict measured using the 0-100 point DCS scale (higher scores indicate more decisional conflict) was reduced by 15.9 points in one study (p<0.01) and 17.8 points in another (95%CI: 13.3-22.9). Lower scores were associated with higher satisfaction with the decision aid by children, caretakers, and clinicians.Conclusion: Stakeholders should advocate initiatives to facilitate a child's participation preferences regarding pediatric SDM since decision support tools help chronically ill children to be more involved in SDM as they increase the children's knowledge and satisfaction and reduce decisional conflicts. What is Known: • Decision aids can help improve participation, knowledge, satisfaction, and health outcomes. • Quality and consistency of the information exchange impact quality and outcome of SDM. What is New: • Depending on a child's age, evolving capacities, and communication and participation preferences, more evidence is needed on which tools are suitable for chronically ill children to ensure their preferred participation in pediatric SDM. • Pediatricians adopt healthcare SDM tools and techniques that do not always take into account that a child's right to participate in pediatric SDM including the tendency to use interventions that are not specifically designed for pediatrics.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPatient ParticipationAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolChronic DiseaseHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareParentsChronic illnessDecision aidsPatient-centered careSelf-determinationShared decision-makingTriadic information exchange

Identifiers

PMID33821341
PMCPMC8285312
OpenAlexW3141730182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.