ArticleThe Journal of supercomputing2021
A two-step rumor detection model based on the supernetwork theory about Weibo.
Article in The Journal of supercomputing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Rumor Detection Method from Social Network Based on Deep Learning in Big Data Environment.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based on the supernetwork theory, a two-step rumor detection model was proposed. The first step was the classification of users on the basis of user-based features. In the second step, non-user-based features, including psychology-based features, content-based features, and parts of supernetwork-based features, were used to detect rumors posted by different types of users. Four machine learning methods, namely, Naive Bayes, Neural Network, Support Vector Machine, and Logistic Regression, were applied to train the classifier. Four real cases and several assessment metrics were employed to verify the effectiveness of the proposed model. Performance of the model regarding early rumor detection was also evaluated by separating the datasets according to the posting time of posts. Results showed that this model exhibited better performance in rumor detection compared to five benchmark models, mainly owing to the application of the supernetwork theory and the two-step mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.