Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33821088›Full record

ArticleApplied cognitive psychology

When we are worried, what are we thinking? Anxiety, lack of control, and conspiracy beliefs amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.

Jakub Šrol, Eva Ballová Mikušková, Vladimíra Čavojová

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied cognitive psychology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Governmentality Versus Community: The Impact of the COVID Lockdowns.International journal of community well-being · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jakub ŠrolInstitute of Experimental Psychology Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences Bratislava Slovakia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1168-2639
Eva Ballová MikuškováInstitute of Experimental Psychology Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences Bratislava Slovakia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9162-7735
Vladimíra ČavojováInstitute of Experimental Psychology Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences Bratislava Slovakia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7295-8803

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Societal crises and stressful events are associated with an upsurge of conspiracy beliefs that may help people to tackle feelings of lack of control. In our study (

Indexed as

anxietyconspiracy beliefsCOVID‐19epistemically suspect beliefslack of control

Identifiers

PMID33821088
PMCPMC8013184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.