Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33821082›Full record

ArticleJournal of Raman spectroscopy : JRS2021

An efficient primary screening of COVID-19 by serum Raman spectroscopy.

Gang Yin, Lintao Li, Shun Lu, Yu Yin, Yuanzhang Su, Yilan Zeng, Mei Luo, Maohua Ma, Hongyan Zhou, Lucia Orlandini and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Raman spectroscopy : JRS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gang YinDepartment of Radiation Oncology Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute Chengdu China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9995-4629
Lintao LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute Chengdu China.
Shun LuDepartment of Radiation Oncology Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute Chengdu China.
Yu YinSichuan Institute for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Intelligence, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu China.
Yuanzhang SuSchool of Foreign Languages University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu China.
Yilan ZengClinical Laboratory The Public Health Clinical Center of Chengdu Chengdu China.
Mei LuoClinical Laboratory The Public Health Clinical Center of Chengdu Chengdu China.
Maohua MaClinical Laboratory The Public Health Clinical Center of Chengdu Chengdu China.
Hongyan ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute Chengdu China.
Lucia OrlandiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute Chengdu China.
Dezhong YaoSichuan Institute for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Intelligence, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu China.
Gang LiuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College Chengdu China.
Jinyi LangDepartment of Radiation Oncology Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute Chengdu China.
Sichuan Cancer Hospital · CNPublic Health Clinical Center of Chengdu · CNUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus disease around the end of 2019 has become a pandemic. The preferred method for COVID-19 detection is the real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based technique; however, it also has certain limitations, such as sample-dependent procedures with a relatively high false negative ratio. We propose a safe and efficient method for screening COVID-19 based on Raman spectroscopy. A total of 177 serum samples are collected from 63 confirmed COVID-19 patients, 59 suspected cases, and 55 healthy individuals as a control group. Raman spectroscopy is adopted to analyze these samples, and a machine learning support-vector machine (SVM) method is applied to the spectrum dataset to build a diagnostic algorithm. Furthermore, 20 independent individuals, including 5 asymptomatic COVID-19 patients and 5 symptomatic COVID-19 patients, 5 suspected patients, and 5 healthy patients, were sampled for external validation. In these three groups-confirmed COVID-19, suspected, and healthy individuals-the distribution of statistically significant points of difference showed highly consistency for intergroups after repeated sampling processes. The classification accuracy between the COVID-19 cases and the suspected cases is 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-0.88), and the accuracy between the COVID-19 and the healthy controls is 0.90 (95% CI: 0.89-0.91), while the accuracy between the suspected cases and the healthy control group is 0.68 (95% CI: 0.67-0.73). For the independent test dataset, we apply the obtained SVM model to the classification of the independent test dataset to have all the results correctly classified. Our model showed that the serum-level classification results were all correct for independent test dataset. Our results suggest that Raman spectroscopy could be a safe and efficient technique for COVID-19 screening.

Indexed as

COVID‐19machine learningRaman spectroscopyscreening, support vector machine

Identifiers

PMID33821082
PMCPMC8014023
OpenAlexW3132316348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.