Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33820924›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Multi-center clinical study using optical coherence tomography for evaluation of cervical lesions in-vivo.

Chenchen Ren, Xianxu Zeng, Zhongna Shi, Chunyan Wang, Huifen Wang, Xiuqin Wang, Baoping Zhang, Zhaoning Jiang, Huan Ma, Hao Hu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Chenchen RenDepartment of Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Xianxu ZengDepartment of Pathology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Zhongna ShiDepartment of Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Chunyan WangDepartment of Gynecology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, 110042, China.
Huifen WangDepartment of Gynecology, Luohe Central Hospital, Luohe, 462000, China.
Xiuqin WangDepartment of Gynecology, Puyang Oilfield General Hospital, Puyang, 457001, China.
Baoping ZhangDepartment of Gynecology, Zhengzhou Jinshui District General Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Zhaoning JiangZhengzhou Ultralucia Medical Technology Ltd., Zhengzhou, 450016, China.
Huan MaZhengzhou Ultralucia Medical Technology Ltd., Zhengzhou, 450016, China.
Hao HuZhengzhou Ultralucia Medical Technology Ltd., Zhengzhou, 450016, China.
Haozhe PiaoDepartment of Gynecology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, 110042, China.
Xiaoan ZhangDepartment of Imaging, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China. zxa@zzu.edu.cn.
Baojin WangDepartment of Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China. 307797362@qq.com.
Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNZhengzhou University of Science and Technology · CNLiaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute · CNDaqing Oilfield General Hospital · CNLuohe Medical College · CNZhengzhou Jinshui District General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this prospective study of an in-vivo cervical examination using optical coherence tomography (OCT), we evaluated the diagnostic value of non-invasive and real-time OCT in cervical precancerous lesions and cancer diagnosis, and determined the characteristics of OCT images. 733 patients from 5 Chinese hospitals were inspected with OCT and colposcopy-directed biopsy. The OCT images were compared with the histological sections to find out the characteristics of various categories of lesions. The OCT images were also interpreted by 3 investigators to make a 2-class classification, and the results were compared against the pathological results. Various structures of the cervical tissue were clearly observed in OCT images, which matched well with the corresponding histological sections. The OCT diagnosis results delivered a sensitivity of 87.0% (95% confidence interval, CI 82.2-90.7%), a specificity of 84.1% (95% CI 80.3-87.2%), and an overall accuracy of 85.1%. Both good consistency of OCT images and histological images and satisfactory diagnosis results were provided by OCT. Due to its features of non-invasion, real-time, and accuracy, OCT is valuable for the in-vivo evaluation of cervical lesions and has the potential to be one of the routine cervical diagnosis methods.

Indexed as

Tomography, Optical CoherenceAdultCervix UteriColposcopyFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeoplasm GradingSquamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the CervixStatistics as TopicUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33820924
PMCPMC8021566
OpenAlexW3140830934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.