ArticleBMJ open2021
Longitudinal analyses of gender differences in first authorship publications related to COVID-19.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using Hofstede's framework to explore surgical cultures and their impact on female surgeons.Medical education · 2025Article
- Global distribution of research efforts, disease burden, and impact of US public funding withdrawal.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- Global Trends and Cross-Country Differences in Authorship by Women in Academic Anaesthesiology Since 1996: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating Covid-19 publications for sex and gender-specific health content: A bibliometric analysis.PloS one · 2025Article
- A review of authorship in herpes simplex virus type-2 (HSV-2) research conducted in low-income and middle-income countries between 2000 and 2020.BMJ global health · 2024Review
- The urgency of restructuring the landscape of behavioral medicine: Commentary from early-career diversity institute scholars.Translational behavioral medicine · 2024Article
- Trends in Scientific Collaboration Between Men and Women Following the #MeToo Movement.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Review
- Gender disparity between first and senior authors on liver cancer research in the top journals of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.PloS one · 2024Article
- Gender disparities in altmetric attention scores for cardiovascular research.Communications biology · 2023Article
- The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the gender gap in research productivity within academia.eLife · 2023Article
- Analysis of peer reviewers' response to invitations by gender and geographical region: cohort study of manuscripts reviewed at 21 biomedical journals before and during covid-19 pandemic.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Article
- Moving toward gender equity in the cardiology and cardiovascular research workforce in Germany: a report from the German Cardiac Society.European heart journal open · 2023Article
- The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on gendered research productivity and its correlates.Journal of informetrics · 2023Article
- Gender Inequalities in Publications about COVID-19 in Spain: Authorship and Sex-Disaggregated Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Analysis of gender representation, authorship inflation, and institutional affiliation in abstract acceptance: a 5-year study.Global surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education · 2023Article
- Impact of COVID-19 on the private and professional lives of highly educated women working in global health in Europe-A qualitative study.Frontiers in global women's health · 2023Article
- Women Physicians in Academic Medicine of Japan.JMA journal · 2022Review
- Coming to Terms With a New Normal: Recovery, Resilience, and Opportunities in a Post-COVID-19 World.Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2022Article
- Article
- Scientific authorship by gender: trends before and during a global pandemic.Humanities & social sciences communications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveConcerns have been raised that the COVID-19 pandemic has shifted research productivity to the disadvantage of women in academia, particularly in early career stages. In this study, we aimed to assess the pandemic's effect on women's COVID-19-related publishing over the first year of the pandemic. METHODS AND
resultsWe compared the gender distribution of first authorships for 42 898 publications on COVID-19 from 1 February 2020 to 31 January 2021 to 483 232 publications appearing in the same journals during the same period the year prior. We found that the gender gap-the percentage of articles on which men versus women were first authors-widened by 14 percentage points during the COVID-19 pandemic, despite many pertinent research fields showing near equal proportions of men and women first authors publishing in the same fields before the pandemic. Longitudinal analyses revealed that the significant initial expansions of the gender gap began to trend backwards to expected values over time in many fields. As women may have been differentially affected depending on their geography, we also assessed the gender distribution of first authorships grouped by countries and geographical areas. While we observed a significant reduction of the shares of women first authors in almost all countries, longitudinal analyses confirmed a resolving trend over time.
conclusionThe reduction in women's COVID-19-related research output appears particularly concerning as many disciplines informing the response to the pandemic had near equal gender shares of first authorship in the year prior to the pandemic. The acute productivity drain with the onset of the pandemic magnifies deep-rooted obstacles on the way to gender equity in scientific contribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.