ArticleUrologic oncology2021
National trends in clinical and pathologic staging for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Implications for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Article in Urologic oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWith growing support of perioperative chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), current biopsy methods are challenging, and little is known as to the degree to which patients would appropriately receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) from biopsy alone. Herein, we sought to assess the rates of appropriate clinical use of NAC and identify clinicopathologic factors associated with aggressive UTUC amongst patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for clinically localized disease.
methodsFrom 2004 to 2013, we identified all treatment naïve patients diagnosed with clinically localized, high grade UTUC (cTa-4Nx) who underwent RNU from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Pathologic criteria for NAC (pT2-4N0,x; pTanyN1) from RNU represented the primary outcome. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were utilized to identify covariates associated with primary outcome to determine appropriate use of NAC.
resultsDuring the study interval, 5,362 patients were diagnosed with clinically localized UTUC and underwent RNU. Overall, 49.1% of patients presented with an unknown primary tumor stage (Tx) and 24.5% had invasive UTUC from biopsy. On multivariable analysis, upper tract tumor size was associated with invasive UTUC eligible for NAC (all P < 0.05). Amongst patients with cTx UTUC from biopsy, half of patients had pathologic noninvasive UTUC (pTa,is,1) from RNU and would be overtreated with NAC.
conclusionSignificant uncertainty persists in assigning primary upper tract tumor depth and represents a key barrier to widespread implementation of NAC for patients with high grade UTUC. Further research is needed to more accurately determine clinical criteria to identify patients for NAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.