Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33820654›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of surgery2021

Predicting postoperative opioid use with machine learning and insurance claims in opioid-naïve patients.

Jaewon Hur, Shengpu Tang, Vidhya Gunaseelan, Joceline Vu, Chad M Brummett, Michael Englesbe, Jennifer Waljee, Jenna Wiens

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Moving towards the use of artificial intelligence in pain management.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Preventing pediatric chronic postsurgical pain: Time for increased rigor.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jaewon HurDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Shengpu TangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Vidhya GunaseelanMichigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Joceline VuDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Chad M BrummettMichigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Michael EnglesbeDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Michigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jennifer WaljeeDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Michigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: filip@umich.edu.
Jenna WiensDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: wiensj@umich.edu.
University of Michigan · US

Funding

oPIOIDS: Prevention of Iatrogenic Opioid Dependence after SurgeryR01DA042859 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BRUMMETT, CHAD M, WALJEE, JENNIFER FILIP · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical impact of postoperative opioid use requires accurate prediction strategies to identify at-risk patients. We utilize preoperative claims data to predict postoperative opioid refill and new persistent use in opioid-naïve patients.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 112,898 opioid-naïve adult postoperative patients from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart database. Potential predictors included sociodemographic data, comorbidities, and prescriptions within one year prior to surgery.

resultsCompared to linear models, non-linear models led to modest improvements in predicting refills - area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) 0.68 vs. 0.67 (p < 0.05) - and performed identically in predicting new persistent use - AUROC = 0.66. Undergoing major surgery, opioid prescriptions within 30 days prior to surgery, and abdominal pain were useful in predicting refills; back/joint/head pain were the most important features in predicting new persistent use.

conclusionsPreoperative patient attributes from insurance claims could potentially be useful in guiding prescription practices for opioid-naïve patients.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsInsurance Claim ReviewMachine LearningPostoperative PeriodPreoperative PeriodAbdominal PainAdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidArea Under CurveArthralgiaBack PainComorbidityDatabases, PharmaceuticalFemaleForecastingAnalgesics, OpioidClaims dataMachine learningPostoperative opioid use

Identifiers

PMID33820654
PMCPMC8373633
OpenAlexW3150339756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.