Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33820645›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychosomatic research2021

Subjective wellbeing in parents during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia.

Elizabeth M Westrupp, Mark A Stokes, Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Tomer S Berkowitz, Tanja Capic, Sarah Khor, Christopher J Greenwood, Antonina Mikocka-Walus, Emma Sciberras, George J Youssef and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychosomatic research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth M WestruppDeakin University, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, School of Psychology, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne, Department of Paediatrics, Victoria, Australia; La Trobe University, Judith Lumley Centre, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: elizabeth.westrupp@deakin.edu.au.
Mark A StokesDeakin University, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, School of Psychology, Victoria, Australia.
Matthew Fuller-TyszkiewiczDeakin University, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, School of Psychology, Victoria, Australia.
Tomer S BerkowitzDeakin University, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, School of Psychology, Victoria, Australia.
Tanja CapicDeakin University, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, School of Psychology, Victoria, Australia.
Sarah KhorDeakin University, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, School of Psychology, Victoria, Australia.
Christopher J GreenwoodDeakin University, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, School of Psychology, Victoria, Australia.
Antonina Mikocka-WalusDeakin University, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, School of Psychology, Victoria, Australia.
Emma SciberrasDeakin University, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, School of Psychology, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne, Department of Paediatrics, Victoria, Australia; La Trobe University, Judith Lumley Centre, Victoria, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
George J YoussefDeakin University, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, School of Psychology, Victoria, Australia.
Craig A OlssonDeakin University, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, School of Psychology, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne, Department of Paediatrics, Victoria, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
Delyse HutchinsonDeakin University, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, School of Psychology, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne, Department of Paediatrics, Victoria, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria, Australia; The University of New South Wales, The National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Australia.
Deakin University · AURoyal Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine (1) the subjective wellbeing of Australian parents raising children and adolescents (0-18 years) during April 2020 'stage three' COVID-19 restrictions, in comparison with parents assessed over 18-years prior to the pandemic; and (2) socio-demographic and COVID-19 predictors of subjective wellbeing during the pandemic.

methodsCross-sectional data were from the COVID-19 Pandemic Adjustment Survey (CPAS, N = 2365 parents of a child 0-18 years, 8-28th April 2020); and a pre-pandemic national database containing 18 years of annual surveys collected in 2002-2019 (N = 17,529 parents).

resultsLevels of subjective wellbeing during the pandemic were considerably lower than ratings prior to the pandemic (Personal Wellbeing Index, mean[SD] = 65.3 [17.0]; compared to [SD] = 75.8 [11.9], p < 0.001). During the pandemic, lower subjective wellbeing was associated with low education (adjusted regression coefficient, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = -5.19, -0.93), language other-than-English (95% CI = -7.22, -1.30), government benefit (95% CI = -6.99, -0.96), single parents (95% CI = -8.84, -4.59), child neurodevelopmental condition (95% CI = -3.44, -0.76), parent physical/mental health problems (95% CI = -3.23, -0.67), COVID-environmental stressors (95% CI = -3.48, -2.44), and fear/worry about COVID-19 (95% CI = -8.13, -5.96). Unexpectedly, parent engagement with news media about the pandemic was associated with higher subjective wellbeing (95% CI = 0.35, 1.61).

conclusionSubjective wellbeing in parents raising children aged 0-18 years appears to be disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and restrictions in Australia. Specific at-risk groups, for which government intervention may be warranted, include parents in socially disadvantaged contexts, parents with pre-existing mental health difficulties, and parents facing significant COVID-19-related work changes.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPandemicsAdultAustraliaCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParentsSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesAustraliaCOVID-19 pandemicFamiliesParentSubjective wellbeing

Identifiers

PMID33820645
PMCPMC9750621
OpenAlexW3147187069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.