Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33820585›Full record

Observational studyPublic health nutrition2021

Foods provided to children in family day care: an observational study.

Erin M Kerr, Bridget Kelly, Megan L Hammersley, Lara Hernandez, Jennifer Norman, Susan Furber, Cecilia Vuong, Sarah Ryan, Karen Wardle, A D Okely

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Public health nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. A Cross-Organisational Collaboration to Promote Healthy Eating and Active Living in Children: A Critical Reflection.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Nutrition and physical activity practices in family day care: A cross-sectional survey of Australian family day care educators.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Erin M KerrEarly Start, Building 21, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2293-7542
Bridget KellyEarly Start, Building 21, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales2522, Australia.
Megan L HammersleyEarly Start, Building 21, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4326-480X
Lara HernandezCentre for Population Health, NSW Ministry of Health, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Jennifer NormanEarly Start, Building 21, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6344-2605
Susan FurberIllawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4933-1567
Cecilia VuongHealth Promotion Service, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
Sarah RyanEarly Start, Building 21, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7574-1936
Karen WardleHealth Promotion Service, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
A D OkelyEarly Start, Building 21, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1626-8170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the quality and quantity of foods and beverages provided to children aged 0-5 years in family day care and identify structural and sociodemographic factors associated with the nutritional quality of food provided.

designA cross-sectional study measured the food and beverages provided to children using weighed food records. The number of serves from different food groups was calculated according to the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating, and a healthy food provision index score was created. Associations between structural and sociodemographic factors and healthy food provision index scores were analysed using linear mixed models.

settingFamily day care services in two large geographic areas in New South Wales, Australia.

participantsOne hundred and four children in thirty-three family day care services.

resultsDuring attendance at childcare, most children met recommended servings of fruit but not dairy, vegetables, lean meat and meat alternatives and wholegrains. Discretionary foods exceeded recommendations. Children's age, socio-economic status and the type of main meal provided were significantly associated with the healthy food provision index score.

conclusionsFoods provided to children in family day care are aligned with dietary recommendations for fruit but not vegetables, dairy, lean meat and meat alternatives, wholegrains or discretionary foods. Interventions to promote healthy eating are needed to support families and educators to improve the nutritional quality of food provided to children.

Indexed as

Child Day Care CentersDay Care, MedicalAustraliaChildCross-Sectional StudiesDietEnergy IntakeFruitHumansVegetablesChildrenFamily day careFood provisionNutrition

Identifiers

PMID33820585
PMCPMC10195361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.