ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2021
Individualized embryo selection strategy developed by stacking machine learning model for better in vitro fertilization outcomes: an application study.
Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical evaluation and predictive model development of AI-based non-invasive embryo selection inFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Current progress and open challenges for applying artificial intelligence across thePatterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Nanomedicine and Organ-specific Therapy: An Updated Review.Current drug targets · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Decision Support Algorithms, Mathematical Models, Calculators Applications in Infertility: Systematic Review and Hands-On Digital Applications.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Review
- Advanced KPI framework for IVF pregnancy prediction models in IVF protocols.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A critical appraisal of studies on endometrial thickness and embryo transfer outcome.Reproductive biomedicine online · 2023Review
- Delineating the heterogeneity of embryo preimplantation development using automated and accurate morphokinetic annotation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Article
- Personalized prediction of the secondary oocytes number after ovarian stimulation: A machine learning model based on clinical and genetic data.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Small Non-Coding RNAs as New Biomarkers to Evaluate the Quality of the Embryo in the IVF Process.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- Machine Learning-Based Modeling of Ovarian Response and the Quantitative Evaluation of Comprehensive Impact Features.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer liver metastases.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
- GVBD rate is an independent predictor for pregnancy in ICSI patients with surplus immature oocytes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Live-Birth Prediction of Natural-CycleFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Multifactor Prediction of Embryo Transfer Outcomes Based on a Machine Learning Algorithm.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Article
- Embryo Culture Systems and Morphokinetics in IVF: The Role of Time-Lapse Monitoring and Artificial Intelligence in Embryo Selection.Journal of reproduction & infertilityReview
- Transfer Strategy Minimizing Twin Risk of Double Blastocyst Transfers Based on Prediction Models.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo minimize the rate of in vitro fertilization (IVF)- associated multiple-embryo gestation, significant efforts have been made. Previous studies related to machine learning in IVF mainly focused on selecting the top-quality embryos to improve outcomes, however, in patients with sub-optimal prognosis or with medium- or inferior-quality embryos, the selection between SET and DET could be perplexing.
methodsThis was an application study including 9211 patients with 10,076 embryos treated during 2016 to 2018, in Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China. A hierarchical model was established using the machine learning system XGBoost, to learn embryo implantation potential and the impact of double embryos transfer (DET) simultaneously. The performance of the model was evaluated with the AUC of the ROC curve. Multiple regression analyses were also conducted on the 19 selected features to demonstrate the differences between feature importance for prediction and statistical relationship with outcomes.
resultsFor a single embryo transfer (SET) pregnancy, the following variables remained significant: age, attempts at IVF, estradiol level on hCG day, and endometrial thickness. For DET pregnancy, age, attempts at IVF, endometrial thickness, and the newly added P1 + P2 remained significant. For DET twin risk, age, attempts at IVF, 2PN/ MII, and P1 × P2 remained significant. The algorithm was repeated 30 times, and averaged AUC of 0.7945, 0.8385, and 0.7229 were achieved for SET pregnancy, DET pregnancy, and DET twin risk, respectively. The trend of predictive and observed rates both in pregnancy and twin risk was basically identical. XGBoost outperformed the other two algorithms: logistic regression and classification and regression tree.
conclusionArtificial intelligence based on determinant-weighting analysis could offer an individualized embryo selection strategy for any given patient, and predict clinical pregnancy rate and twin risk, therefore optimizing clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.