Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33819450›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2021

Telemedicine and Telehealth in Nursing Homes: An Integrative Review.

Lisa L Groom, Margaret M McCarthy, Amy Witkoski Stimpfel, Abraham A Brody

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
30.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Remote care through telehealth for people with inflammatory bowel disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa L GroomNew York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: llg322@nyu.edu.
Margaret M McCarthyNew York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.
Amy Witkoski StimpfelNew York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.
Abraham A BrodyNew York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York, NY, USA; Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing, New York, NY, USA; Division of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
New York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTelemedicine and telehealth are increasingly used in nursing homes (NHs). Their use was accelerated further by the COVID-19 pandemic, but their impact on patients and outcomes has not been adequately investigated. These technologies offer promising avenues to detect clinical deterioration early, increasing clinician's ability to treat patients in place. A review of literature was executed to further explore the modalities' ability to maximize access to specialty care, modernize care models, and improve patient outcomes.

designWhittemore and Knafl's integrative review methodology was used to analyze quantitative and qualitative studies. SETTING AND

participantsPrimary research conducted in NH settings or focused on NH residents was included. Participants included clinicians, NH residents, subacute patients, and families.

methodsPubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, PsycNET, and JSTOR were searched, yielding 16 studies exploring telemedicine and telehealth in NH settings between 2014 and 2020.

resultsMeasurable impacts such as reduced emergency and hospital admissions, financial savings, reduced physical restraints, and improved vital signs were found along with process improvements, such as expedient access to specialists. Clinician, resident, and family perspectives were also discovered to be roundly positive. Studies showed wide methodologic heterogeneity and low generalizability owing to small sample sizes and incomplete study designs. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Preliminary evidence was found to support geriatrician, psychiatric, and palliative care consults through telemedicine. Financial and clinical incentives such as Medicare savings and reduced admissions to hospitals were also supported. NHs are met with increased challenges as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which telemedicine and telehealth may help to mitigate. Additional research is needed to explore resident and family opinions of telemedicine and telehealth use in nursing homes, as well as remote monitoring costs and workflow changes incurred with its use.

Indexed as

Nursing HomesTelemedicineAgedHumansMedicareUnited Statesnursing homesremote monitoringskilled nursing facilitiestelehealthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33819450
PMCPMC9626369
OpenAlexW3139976632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.