ArticleExperimental neurology2021
Dual motor cortex and spinal cord neuromodulation improves rehabilitation efficacy and restores skilled locomotor function in a rat cervical contusion injury model.
Article in Experimental neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Research progress on the neuromodulation targets in stroke rehabilitation].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Review
- Reopening Motor Learning Windows: Targeted Re-Engagement of Latent Pathways via Non-Invasive Neuromodulation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Interplay Between Neuromodulation and Stem Cell Therapy for Sensory-Motor Neuroplasticity After Spinal Cord Injury: A Perspective View.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Hyperreflexia after corticospinal tract lesion reflects 1 A afferent circuit changes not increased KCC2 hyperexcitability.Experimental neurology · 2025Article
- Combining cortical and spinal stimulation maximizes the improvement of gait after spinal cord injury.iScience · 2025Article
- Intraspinal microstimulation of the ventral horn has therapeutically relevant cross-modal effects on nociception.Brain communications · 2024Article
- Boosting corticospinal system synaptic plasticity to recover motor functions.Neural regeneration research · 2023Article
- Recent progress and challenges in the treatment of spinal cord injury.Protein & cell · 2023Review
- Adapting Human-Based Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation to Develop a Clinically Relevant Animal Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- When Spinal Neuromodulation Meets Sensorimotor Rehabilitation: Lessons Learned From Animal Models to Regain Manual Dexterity After a Spinal Cord Injury.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Motor recovery after spinal cord injury is limited due to sparse descending pathway axons caudal to the injury. Rehabilitation is the primary treatment for paralysis in humans with SCI, but only produces modest functional recovery. Here, we determined if dual epidural motor cortex (M1) intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and cathodal transcutaneous spinal direct stimulation (tsDCS) enhances the efficacy of rehabilitation in improving motor function after cervical SCI. iTBS produces CST axon sprouting and tsDCS enhances M1-evoked spinal activity and muscle contractions after SCI. Rats were trained to perform the horizontal ladder task. Animals received a moderate midline C4 contusion, producing bilateral forelimb impairments. After 2 weeks, animals either received 10 days of iTBS+tsDCS or no stimulation; subsequently, all animals received 6 weeks of daily rehabilitation on the horizontal ladder task. Lesion size was not different in the two animal groups. Rehabilitation alone improved performance by a 22% reduction in skilled locomotion error rate, whereas stimulation+rehabilitation was markedly more effective (52%), and restored error rate to pre-injury levels. Stimulation+rehabilitation significantly increased CST axon length caudal to the injury and the amount of ventral horn label was positively correlated with functional improvement. The stimulation+rehabilitation group had significantly less proprioceptive afferent terminal labelling in the intermediate zone and fewer synapses on motoneurons . Afferent fiber terminal labeling was negatively correlated with motor recovery. Thus, the dual neuromodulation protocol promotes adaptive plasticity in corticospinal and proprioceptive afferents networks after contusion SCI, leading to enhanced rehabilitation efficacy and recovery of skilled locomotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.